Vitter to visit Monroe Wednesday

From The News Star.

U.S. Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, will visit Monroe and Ruston on Wednesday as he campaigns for U.S. Senate.

Vitter will attend a Ruston press conference with the National Federation of Independent Businesses at 1:30-2 p.m. at Power Products, 1800 Trade Drive.

He will then come to Monroe to watch Vice President Dick Cheney address the Republican National Convention on television with residents at Bubba Luigi's restaurant, 1210 North 18th St., from 6:30 to 9:30 p.m.

Latest poll

I got this little blurb from Lapolitics.com

GOP Senate Poll Shows Little Change

A poll done for the National Republican Senate Committee shows Congressman David Vitter leading with 35 percent, followed by Congressman Chris John, 18 percent, Treasurer John Kennedy, 16 percent, state Rep. Arthur Morrell, 3 percent. Public Opinion Strategies sampled 1,000 voters on Aug. 10-12.

Presidential campaign will have impact on Senate race

From The Advocate.

There's a presidential flavor to Louisiana's U.S. Senate campaign.

That's not surprising, since both elections will be on the ballot on Tuesday, Nov. 2.

The four major U.S. Senate candidates say they are running "Louisiana-based" campaigns, stressing issues important to state voters.

But it's not unusual for the names of President George W. Bush and U.S. Sen. John Kerry -- the two presidential contenders -- to roll off the tongues of the candidates seeking to replace retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. John Breaux.

U.S. Rep. David Vitter, the lone big-name Republican in the field, frequently notes that his major Democratic opponents are supporting "liberal" Massachusetts Democrat Kerry for the presidency.

"I think the biggest thing that helps me is that voters are going to decide very clearly that in the presidential race President Bush represents conservative mainstream Louisiana values, and John Kerry is very out of touch with Louisiana," said Vitter.

(snip)

Vitter, of Metairie, represents the 1st Congressional District. He is a big Bush backer, and the president supports his candidacy.

John, Kennedy and Morrell are in Kerry's camp, but Morrell is the only one actively campaigning for Kerry.

(snip)

Vitter is considered to be sitting in the catbird seat, leading in a variety of public-opinion polls, with John and Kennedy fighting it out for the No. 2 spot in a Dec. 4 runoff.

(snip)

Vitter said Democrats will have a hard time convincing voters that his campaign is being orchestrated by Washington interests or that he's in lock-step with Bush.

He points to Louisianians who form his top campaign staff.

"I'm certainly running a very Louisiana-based campaign focused on Louisiana issues," said Vitter. He noted his campaign platform is: "Fighting for Our Future: David Vitter's Bold Louisiana Agenda."

Vitter said he's skipping the Republican National Convention in New York City this week, opting instead to underscore convention themes out on the campaign trail.

Interesting article about Bobby Jindal

It's taking a bit of a detour from our coverage of Vitter's campaign, but I found this fascinating, plus Bobby will be my next congressman.

From the Atlantic Journal Constitution.

They were just children when he was president. But last June, Ben Domenech and his wife, Caroline, waited six hours to walk past the casket of Ronald Reagan as it lay in state in the Capitol Rotunda.

"My wife and I were both born in the '80s, and when we were young, the only president we ever remembered was Ronald Reagan," said Domenech, a 22-year-old speechwriter for Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).

That devotion to Reagan's legacy is a defining characteristic of Domenech and five other young Republicans, ages 22 to 35, profiled in the Journal-Constitution today, on the eve of the Republican National Convention. They represent a sampling of young party activists.

They aren't the rebels that Lee Atwater, Karl Rove and Ralph Reed were in the 1970s, when they mounted their first political campaigns for offices in the College Republicans organization. But, thanks in large part to the efforts of that earlier generation, Reagan's conservatism displaced the moderates who once led the party and is now a pillar of Republican identity.

"I see a lot of young conservatives now that are intelligent and more aware of what they believe at a younger age than many you would have seen in another generation," said Domenech.

Young Republicans such as Louisiana congressional candidate Bobby Jindal and Virginia Republican Chairwoman Kate Obenshain Griffin see themselves as inheritors of a broadening conservative tradition

(snip)

A central concern of this younger generation is that the party get over the demographic hurdles that have kept its membership mostly white and native-born.

"To be true to its principles, my party has to stand strongly and unambiguously for opportunity for all Americans," said Jindal, a 33-year-old Indian-American. In campaign speeches, Jindal relates the GOP's conservative, free-market philosophy to the values of his industrious immigrant parents, "who could have gone anywhere, but chose to come here."

(snip)

"We have a real choice," said Jindal, who has held several high-profile government health care positions. "We can either let government take over more and more of the responsibility for our health care system, or we can rely on business to fill the gaps that exist now. But if we do that, we've got to confront a lot of issues, not only price of care and drug costs, but emergency room accessibility and a whole host of issues."

(snip)

Some polls this year have shown younger voters leaning toward Democratic Sen. John Kerry, but Domenech expressed confidence they'll come around to Bush by Election Day.

Younger voters aren't as familiar with the importance of issues like tax cuts and tax breaks for families, he said, noting a survey that showed a high percentage get most of their news watching Comedy Central's "The Daily Show." "So if they're only getting their news from 'The Daily Show,' then they're not getting much news."

Vitter says no to third party ads

From the Official Vitter Website.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Mac Abrams
(504) 833-1163

David Vitter Comments on Third-Party Ads

“Watching my local news last Friday night, I was surprised to see a television ad featuring myself. While it was a positive piece, I was disappointed that third parties have already begun their assault on Louisiana. In the past few elections, our state has been a victim of inaccurate and troublesome third party ads and I express my strong desire that all third parties stay out of this Senate race and let the candidates run their own campaigns. I hope that Louisianians and the media will hold all commercials, whether third party or candidate sponsored, to the highest level of scrutiny for their truthfulness and accuracy,” said David Vitter.

We're Still Here...

Campaign news has suddenly slowed to a trickle this week, mostly overshadowed by the ongoing Rodney Alexander saga as well as other things, so that's why the blog has gone a little cold. I am working on something to show you, hopefully it'll be very soon when it's ready.

Vitter has solid lead, but second place remains unclear

Recent polls show David Vitter increasing his lead in Louisiana's senate race. However, the man he will face off with in the runoff remains unknown. In the first poll, Chris John leads Kennedy by 7 points for second place, in the second poll, Kennedy outpaces John by 3.

Perhaps, not surprisingly, the polls that show John and Kennedy in the lead were each conducted by their own campaigns.

NRSC.org

Excerpted from the Louisiana Political Fax Weekly; August 20, 2004

A new poll conducted for the Chris John campaign shows Republican Congressman David Vitter consolidating conservative support and John moving into second place over John Kennedy.

The survey results by Greenberg Quinlan are: Vitter, 42 percent; John, 21; Kennedy, 15; Arthur Morrell, 3; Undecided, 19. The Washington pollster's 600-sample of likely voters was taken Aug. 9-15 and has a margin of error of 4 percent.

A source that has seen the poll's internal numbers says Vitter has consolidated conservative support now that qualifying has passed and he is the only major GOP candidate...

From Bayoubuzz.com

State Treasurer John Kennedy leads Congressman Chris John for one of the runoff spots in the November 2nd primary for U.S. Senate. According to results of a survey taken by Penn-Schoen & Berland Associates of 734 likely Louisiana voters taken from July 8th to 12th, with a margin of error of 3.62%.

Kennedy enjoys his lead despite Congressman Chris John receiving the endorsement of retiring Senator John Breaux.

Here are the poll results:

Republican David Vitter 33%
Democrat John Kennedy 18%
Democrat Chris John 15%
Democrat Arthur Morrell 3%
Don’t know/refused 31%

Novak: Vitter fights invitation of foreign observers to monitor U.S. election

From Townhall.com

FOREIGN ELECTION MONITORS

Republican members of Congress are furious with Secretary of State Colin Powell for inviting international observers to monitor November's presidential election despite a House-passed bill, pending in the Senate, that would prohibit public funds for such purposes.

Republican Rep. David Vitter has written Powell a letter of protest. Vitter, running for the Senate from Louisiana, called on State to "rescind the invitation" and "devote its time to diplomacy and pressing events overseas, rather than playing some role in domestic political events."

Following the 2000 Florida recount, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) sent 10 observers to the 2002 Florida elections and two observers to the 2003 California recall. The Congressional Black Caucus and other Democrats have demanded foreign monitoring of this year's voting.

Vitter opposes foreign observances, remains consistent on issue

From the same article, here is what Congressman Vitter has to say. Unlike Chris John, Vitter remains consistent on the issue and has criticized the state department for inviting the OSCE to monitor our elections.

Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, the only Republican in the race to replace Breaux, made it clear he thinks the issue should be part of the Louisiana campaign, pointing to a House vote last month on a resolution to block United Nations involvement.

(snip)

The House vote Vitter highlighted was on a GOP amendment to prohibit any taxpayer money from being used to give the international organization any authority over U.S. elections. The amendment by Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Ind., passed on a largely party-line vote.

(snip)

The issue sparked to life again last week when Secretary of State Colin Powell announced that he had invited the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to send observers to the United States for the election, pointing out that the group previously sent observers with little fanfare to U.S. races in 2002 and 2003.

Vitter said he was "absolutely outraged" by Powell's action, saying he found it "offensive" and a threat to U.S. sovereignty. In a letter to Powell, Vitter said he doesn't deny past or potential problems with voting security or voting rights issues, but suggested the solution isn't international oversight.

(snip)

Vitter said he will seek to expand the Buyer amendment when the bill comes up next month before a House-Senate conference committee to ban both the United Nations and the OSCE from involvement in U.S. elections.

John finally explains UN Vote!

At long last, the odyssey of Chris John's unexplained UN vote comes to an end. Here is what Chris John had to say, straight from The Times Picayune:

...John said the vote was just a meaningless political ploy, and that he supports meaningful efforts to block any international involvement in U.S. elections.

John, who was asked to defend his vote against the GOP resolution during a meeting last week with members of the Louisiana Federation of Police, said the amendment was strictly a political ploy given that it asked to stop financing for United Nations oversight that "can only be requested by President Bush, which he clearly isn't going to request."

John said he opposes any international oversight of U.S. elections and would strongly support any legitimate congressional effort to block the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe from playing any role in the fall elections.

So the effort to ban the funding was not legitimate?

Congressman John's explanation is rather paltry. He must be the only "moderate" Democrat to come to that conclusion. The complete vote is here. Again, many of the Democratic moderates like Gene Taylor, Jim Matheson, Jim Turner, etc, voted for this while John and liberals like Barbara Lee, Corrine Brown, etc, voted against. Whether you take legislation seriously or not, when you cast a vote you are putting your voice on the record. Yes, the ban probably would not be necessary, but principle is involved here.

The bottom line is that Chris John has not repudiated or apologized his vote. He can try to explain his vote away with a cynical rejoinder, but the fact remains that there is a "No" on that roll call vote, and there are no footnotes to a congressman's vote.

Chris John makes statement on foreign observances of American elections (Is John being inconsistent?)

It seems we finally got an answer on how Chris John feels on foreign observances of our elections. Readers of this blog will recall that John voted against a ban of federal funding for the United Nations to observe our presidential elections. However, upon recent news that the state department has invited the OSCE to observe our elections, Chris John has since come out with a statement. Here is what he said, straight from the website.

From the official Chris John website.

"I strongly oppose international organizations' monitoring U.S. elections.

"The Bush administration recently announced it had invited the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to monitor the upcoming election in November. They allowed this group to monitor our congressional elections in 2002, and now they invited them back. I adamantly oppose the Bush administration's request for international monitoring of our elections.

"I believe it is the responsibility of American election officials to protect the voting rights of American voters, not the responsibility of foreign agencies. I supported strong election reform after the 2000 elections in order to safeguard voting rights because a strong America begins here at home with every vote being counted - counted by Americans."

Chris John's stated position simply does not jibe with his UN vote. If he does not think the OSCE should monitor our elections, why did he not make sure the UN could not either, at least not with American tax dollars?

After John's statement, the press release also included this background information. I've highlighted some key sections, and then I will explain:

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe plans to observe the US presidential election this year, concerned by the disputed results in 2000, a spokeswoman said. OSCE members, which include the United States, agreed in 1990 to invite the group to observe their elections. This would be the first invitation to a US presidential election the OSCE accepts, spokeswoman Urdur Gunnarsdottir said.

The agency observed the 2002 congressional election and reported that many of the problems found in the 2000 vote were fixed. US elections officials "succeeded somewhat, but not entirely" in correcting problems encountered in the election of President George W. Bush four years ago, Gunnarsdottir said. The OSCE consists of 55 countries in Europe, Central Asia, and North America working on security-related issues.

The OSCE observed the gubernatorial election in California last year, the State Department said.

Given that OSCE observances have been established to be nothing new, Chris John would have had plenty of time to comment on it. I checked the Lexis-Nexis database and Google to see if Chris John had any statements regarding the OSCE observances prior to his press release. Nothing turned up.

Since Chris John has had no stated record on this issue, all we have so far is his UN funding vote. If this statement truly represents his beliefs, than there is no way he would have voted the way he did. He still has not explained it. As long as Chris John has this unexplained anomaly in his voting record, there will always be reason to doubt where he truly stands.

NRO rates Louisiana "Toss Up"

Among other things, Miller in this article rates the Republicans in good shape in the southern races, with Florida, South Carolina and Georgia leaning to takeovers, and North Carolina and Louisiana as tossups. C'mon, let's go for a GOP sweep this fall and take them all!

From National Review Online.

LOUISIANA: Despite last-minute speculation, former Republican governor Buddy Roemer didn't announce his candidacy, which means congressman David Vitter has the GOP field to himself. Among Democrats, the race is between congressman Chris John, state treasurer John Kennedy, and state representative Arthur Morrell — with either John or Kennedy likely to emerge from the November 2 primary and battle Vitter in the December 4 runoff. TOSS UP

Statement by State Rep. Charlie McDonald (D-LA), Louisiana Democrats for Bush Chairman

It's important to hear from Louisiana Democrats who are not buying into Kerry and the national Democrats' liberal rheortic. John Edwards recently showed up in Louisiana to stump for Kerry. Well, here's what one of his fellow Democrats thinks of Kerry's record.

From Georgewbush.com

ARLINGTON, VA – Today, State Rep. Charlie McDonald (D-LA), Louisiana Democrats for Bush Chairman, issued the following statement on John Edwards' visit to Louisiana:

"John Kerry says Democrats make a 'mistake' in looking to the South for votes, but Southern Democrats aren't going to make the mistake of looking to John Kerry. Kerry doesn't have much credibility in the South after telling rural voters that he represents their 'conservative values' despite being ranked the Senate's most out-of-the-mainstream member, and Kerry isn't taking us seriously considering his decision to stop competing in Louisiana.

"Kerry and his running mate both voted for the Iraq War and they both voted against $87 billion in funding to send equipment like body armor and ammunition to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Kerry previously said it would be 'irresponsible' not to fund our troops, but now boasts of being 'proud' of his vote and says it was a 'complicated' decision. Louisianans know there is nothing 'complicated' about supporting our troops, and we're not going to trust someone who barely showed up for a crucial part of his job. Kerry was absent for 76 percent of public Senate Intelligence Committee hearings during his time on the panel, and he even proposed $6 billion in intelligence funding cuts in the year after the first World Trade Center attack."

Vitter tops contributions from Louisianans, John gets most cash from out of state

From The Advocate

U.S. Rep. Chris John, D-Crowley, raised more than one third of his individual campaign contributions from out of state.

U.S. Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, received the largest chunk of his money from financial, insurance and real estate interests.

And two of Democratic state Treasurer John Kennedy's top contributors came from the banking field.

Those were the findings of a recent independent analysis of campaign contributions for candidates trying to replace Louisiana's retiring U.S. Sen. John Breaux. The review was conducted by the Center For Responsive Politics, a Washington, D.C.,-based nonpartisan political watchdog group.

The analysis covers the first three months of the campaign, ending March 31, and provides a glimpse into where candidates are gaining their support.

In addition to the out-of-state contributions, John also led the field in political-action-committee funding. John collected 39 percent of his money from special interest or ideological party groups, the research shows.

By comparison, Vitter collected 16 percent from PACs and 88 percent of his contributions from inside Louisiana.

Steve Weiss, a spokesman for the center, said voters should not be alarmed at John's fund-raising numbers, but said Vitter's collections could show an advantage.

"It basically shows that Vitter has been able to raise more money in-state," Weiss said. "Raising money in-state could show the support that you're going to get at the polls."

(snip)

Vitter has $3.2 million remaining, according to his latest federal election report, and has been the clear fund-raising leader from the start of the race. His chief contributor in the first quarter was Edison Chouest Offshore, which makes oil drilling vessels in Galliano. The company and its employees contributed $46,326 to Vitter.

Vitter, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, received $122,400 from health professionals. Lawyers and law firms contributed $119,708. Much of his money was raised in his congressional district, including $1 million from New Orleans. Houma, outside his district, added $94,426.

Vitter is proud of his fund-raising, especially because most of the money is coming from inside Louisiana, he said.

"In politics, you learn a lot about a candidate by who supports him," Vitter said. "I'm very proud that I'm supported by the citizens and voters from Louisiana."

Vitter noted that his opponent John ranked as the third-highest incumbent in the House in PAC contributions. Vitter called the situation "worrisome."

Vitter received two $15,000 contributions from companies with headquarters outside the state, Northrop Grumman of Los Angeles and the Associated Builders and Contractors in Arlington, Va. Vitter noted, however, that both organizations have extensive Louisiana operations.

"I certainly take PAC contributions," Vitter said. "Both of these [organizations] are two of Louisiana's biggest employers."

On PAC contributions, Vitter received $330,028 from businesses and $144,708 in Republican party and ideological support, the review showed.

Needless to say, this shoots a big hole in the contention that Vitter is a puppet of national Republican interests, and proves that Vitter's campaign is Louisiana grown, funded, and controlled. Even John Kennedy, the self proclaimed outsider candidate, trails Vitter in Louisiana contributions and only gets thirteen percent less in PAC money than Vitter does. As for Chris John, his proclaimation that Vitter is serving outside interests is foolish when outside interests seem to favor him the most, with over a third of his donations coming from out of state, coupled with his receiving the most PAC contributions of all the candidates.

Vitter urges local governments to preserve traditional marriage

From The Times Picayune.

Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, a candidate for U.S. Senate, denied he was trying to make political hay by urging local governments to adopt a resolution designating heterosexual marriage as the only "natural law" union that "must be maintained for the survival of America's future generations." The Madisonville Town Council adopted the resolution with some heated debate last week and designated Sept. 12 to 18 as Marriage Appreciation Week. Vitter said he sent the proposed resolution to every Louisiana municipality to create momentum for a Sept. 18 vote to put a gay marriage ban in the state's Constitution. Far from seeking publicity, Vitter said his hand was forced on the issue. "I would have been very happy not to have any of this," Vitter said. "The Hollywood left forced us into this debate."

Introducing the "Schumer Doctrine"

Wednesday's debate has brought to light the Democratic candidates' thoughts on the ongoing obstruction of President Bush's judicial nominees. One of them, Judge Charles Pickering of Mississippi, was nominated to the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans. However, his nomination was filibustered by the Democrats, and the president had to recess appoint him. Another nominee was the attorney general of the state of Alabama, Bill Pryor. These nominees are coming under fire because the Senate Democrats want to deny the president his authority to choose judges that will interpret the law, not make it on the bench. They are fantatically supportive of Roe V. Wade and will do anything to keep it from being overturned.

Senator Charles Schumer has led the effort, along with Senator Ted Kennedy, to block nominees that they consider "out of the mainstream." Morrell, John and Kennedy have no problem with using the filibuster as Kennedy and Schumer have devised.

Very well, then.

If the Democrats wish to endorse the obstruction of President Bush's judical nominees, then we will enshrine their decision on this blog's first page. The voters should know that Morrell, John, and Kennedy have endorsed the "Schumer Doctrine." Namely, if you are a judge with deeply held religious beliefs, you are not qualified to serve on the bench.

And Louisiana's Democrats are going along with it.

Vitter promotes coastal restoration plan, vows to get federal funding

From offical Vitter website.

For Immediate Release
Contact: Mac Abrams
(504) 833-1163 or (504) 481-8308

August 12, 2004

Vitter Promotes His Plan to Save Louisiana's Coast

(Thibodaux, La.) – Today, U.S. Congressman David Vitter visited Thibodaux and Morgan City to promote his plan to save Louisiana’s coast as our next U.S. Senator.

“Louisiana’s coast is one of our greatest natural assets. Unfortunately, we are losing about 35 square miles per year or a football field every 38 minutes. Saving our coast is a fight that is vital to our economy and our environment. Now is the time for leadership and action on this worsening problem, and I am releasing a plan on how I will continue to fight for the coast when I am elected to the Senate,” said David Vitter.

In “Fighting to Save Louisiana's Coast,” the latest installment of Fighting for Our Future: David Vitter’s Bold Louisiana Agenda, Vitter outlined the specific efforts he’d pursue to protect and restore Louisiana’s coast.

Vitter said he would work in the Senate to fully fund the efforts to save Louisiana’s coast. He will ensure that the Administration keeps its promise to provide nearly $2 billion to address our most pressing restoration needs under the recently-announced near-term plan, and he will hold the federal government to their promise that the current near-term plan, is just that, only a beginning.

“These first efforts are a significant start, but they are only that — a start,” explained Vitter. “I will build on these efforts and help pass a comprehensive plan to save our coast.”

To ensure that the work is done to address local needs, Vitter believes that restoration decisions should be made by state and local stakeholders, and not federal bureaucrats. He would demand a fairer share for Louisiana from offshore oil and gas royalties and seek legislation to develop a permanent, guaranteed funding source for efforts to fight coastal erosion, such as the source included in the landmark CARA legislation that he helped pass in the House only to see it killed in the Senate.

“Since Louisiana’s infrastructure accounts for 27% of our nation’s oil and gas supplies, we must receive a comparable share from those royalties,” said Vitter.

Vitter also highlighted his record of achieving real results in the fight to save Louisiana's coast. Recently, Vitter fought successfully to obtain a breakthrough commitment from the federal government to save Louisiana's coast. At his insistence, the Administration has scheduled the start of important work sooner rather than later, beginning in 2006 instead of 2008 or later as originally proposed. Also, as a member of the House Budget Committee, he authored and included language in the Congressional Budget that underscores the need for increased federal funding for coastal restoration.

“I will not stop fighting until the full $14 billion is sent to Louisiana to restore our coast,” said Vitter.

Louisiana Democrats support judicial obstruction

During the debate, Congressman Vitter made it clear he would support President Bush's judicial nominees, who have been unfairly blocked by partisian Senate Democrats. These are from the Picayune column I cited earlier.

Vitter likewise found himself the only voice calling for all presidential judicial nominees to get a Senate vote. He said all nominees, despite their party, should be voted on within 60 days.

All three of Vitter's opponents, however, threw their support behind the filibusters.

The Democrats -- U.S. Rep. Chris John, D-Crowley; state Treasurer John Kennedy; and state Rep. Arthur Morrell, D-New Orleans...defended the use of the filibuster in the U.S. Senate to keep certain federal judicial nominees from getting a vote.

...unlike Vitter, [Kennedy] declined to say that all should get Senate votes. John and Morrell defended the filibuster.

This should not be forgotten by Louisiana voters this fall. The only way to break the obstruction in the Senate and stop the slandering of qualified judicial nominees is to send David Vitter to the Senate.

Senate candidates debate

The four candidates for Louisiana's open senate seat had a lively debate Wednesday. Here's parts of a great article that spells out the positions of the candidates very clearly.

From The Times Picayune.

The four major candidates for Louisiana's open U.S. Senate seat clashed in a debate Wednesday night over issues ranging from public school vouchers to political corruption.

Sponsored by the Alliance for Good Government, the debate came as the campaign to replace retiring Sen. John Breaux, D-La., is gaining momentum. No one is expected to win a majority in the Nov. 2 election, and a December runoff is considered likely.

Depending on the outcome of Senate elections elsewhere, Louisiana's December face-off could decide which party controls the narrowly divided U.S. Senate.

(snip)

Vitter said he supports the kind of limited voucher program being tested in the District of Columbia, which lets students in bad schools use government money to pay tuition in private schools, including those run by the Catholic Church.

"To say that children in failing schools . . . don't have any other options, that's wrong," Vitter said.

(snip)

Vitter and John supported the House-passed energy bill, which has been criticized harshly by environmentalists for putting a premium on boosting domestic production.

(snip)

Vitter and John said they would push to make it legal to import low-cost, American-made prescription drugs from Canada, even though they both voted for the Medicare overhaul last year that explicitly banned it. Vitter also called for the expansion of health savings accounts, a controversial proposal that would let workers save money tax free for their medical costs.

(snip)

Vitter won the endorsement on the Alliance for Good Government. Kennedy announced being endorsed Wednesday by the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance, which claims more than 100 local African-American pastors as members.

Vitter endorsed by Alliance for Good Government

From the official Vitter website.

For Immediate Release
Contact: Mac Abrams (504) 833-1163 or (504) 481-8308
August 12, 2004

Alliance for Good Government Endorses David Vitter for U.S. Senate

(Metairie, La.) Today, the Alliance for Good Government, a non-profit organization, endorsed U.S. Congressman David Vitter for United States Senate after conducting a Senate forum with the candidates.

“I am humbled and honored to receive the Alliance for Good Government’s endorsement for U.S. Senator. Their support demonstrates that they feel that I have the plan and proven record to help move Southeast Louisiana forward. This endorsement and the one I received yesterday from Livingston Parish President Mike Grimmer (D-Walker) shows that my campaign is building a coalition of Democrats and independents to help elect me to the U.S. Senate” said David Vitter.

From the Alliance for Good Government Website (www.alliancefgg.com): To foster good government, the Alliance invites candidates to forums which are open to the general public, in which the candidates are asked a variety of questions regarding their positions on political issues and philosophy. The candidates are also allowed to speak directly to the audience at the beginning and conclusion of the forum. A confidential session of the executive membership selects a candidate for the Alliance's endorsement.

The Alliance does not merely endorse a candidate but also, it campaigns for that candidate by printing ballots and distributing them to the general public. Television and newspaper advertisements are also run on a pro-rata share basis throughout the campaign.

Through the endorsement process, the Alliance seeks to inform and assist the electorate in electing public officials with integrity to serve all factions of the community.

Vitter secures endorsement from Democrat

Also found on Vitter website.

For Immediate Release

Contact: Mac Abrams (504) 833-1163 or (504) 481-8308
August 11, 2004

Democratic Parish President Endorses David Vitter For U.S. Senate(Denham Springs, La.) Today, Livingston Parish President Michael “Mike” Grimmer, a Democrat, endorsed U.S. Congressman David Vitter for the United States Senate.

“David Vitter has continued to demonstrate his active involvement and support to Livingston Parish through frequent visits, availability, and assistance with appropriations projects. David will be a valuable asset for Louisiana and Livingston Parish in the U.S. Senate,” said Livingston Parish President Mike Grimmer, Democrat.

“I am humbled and honored to receive Mike’s endorsement. His endorsement further underlines my commitment to work across party lines to do what is best for Louisiana. Mike is a tireless worker for the people of Livingston Parish and I look forward to continuing to work closely with him in the future,” said U.S. Senate Candidate David Vitter.

Rodney Alexander on Hannity and Colmes tonight

Rodney Alexander will be on Hannity and Colmes tonight to explain why he switched to the GOP. I'll post some of his remarks tomorrow, if (hopefully) the weather down here is all right.

Reasons why Alexander switched

This article from the News Star sheds some additional light as to why Alexander broke with the Democrats.

Alexander said that he felt excluded by fellow Democrats, especially after he refused to endorse Democratic nominee U.S. Sen. John Kerry or attend the Democratic National Committee, and that he could be more effective as a Republican.

"I've been having to defend my votes and actions in my own party instead of my party supporting me when I was a Democrat," he said.

In addition, Alexander has been quoted in saying, "I went to Washington as a Louisiana Democrat, pro-life, pro-gun, pro-business and against marriage by people of the same sex... I was a Democrat who was ashamed of some of the things the Democratic party stood for."

More State Democrat Silliness

Louisiana's Democrats are at it again. Now they are taking jibes at the GOP convention in Lafayette and the out of state Republicans that have come to stump for Vitter. As before, I'll comment on their press release as I go along.

This comes from the bottom of this page on Bayoubuzz.com

BATON ROUGE – David Vitter’s national Republican circus continued this weekend with U.S. Senator Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), Colorado Governor Bill Owens and Michael Reagan stumping for the GOP Senate candidate at the state Republican convention in Lafayette, Louisiana. Despite parading national Republicans around the state for months and continuing to do so, Vitter told The Advocate last week that he’s not running a “national Republican-based campaign.”[1][1]

Having people of like mind vouch for your character and your positions hardly means that are you are turning your campaign over to them.

David Vitter’s actions betray his words, standing shoulder to shoulder recently with Vice President Dick Cheney, Rudy Giuliani and Bill Frist, who traveled to the Bayou state at Vitter’s behest. Vitter exploited Giuliani’s political celebrity to its fullest extent, taking in over $300,000 at a New Orleans fundraiser with the former New York City Mayor.[2][2]

And while in Boston at the Democratic convention, Chris John hosted a party that was attended by Hollywood stars. He had no problems convorting with the Hollywood elite, in addition to his support of the very liberal Kerry-Edwards ticket. Who is more in tune with Louisiana, Whoopi Goldberg or Dick Cheney?

Vitter’s national Republican stage show began last week with Labor Secretary and fellow Washington Republican Elaine Chao, who spoke at a forum on labor issues hosted by the GOP Senate hopeful. Conspicuously absent from the forum were Louisiana’s workers.

The show continued over the weekend when Elizabeth Dole “used much of her 40-minute speech at the Louisiana Republican Convention on Saturday to support U.S. Rep. David Vitter’s Senate campaign.”[3][3] Others speaking at the gathering included Colorado Governor Bill Owens and Michael Reagan, adding to the national Republican acts invading Louisiana.

Fine people, all. I'm sure what they had to say was enlightening and inspiring. Some of what Michael Reagan said can be found here.

“It’s no secret that David Vitter puts the interests of national Republicans above the interests of Lousianaians,” said Mike Skinner, Chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party. “What’s shocking is David Vitter’s hypocrisy in claiming to run a ‘Louisiana-based campaign’[4][4] at the same time national Republicans are criss-crossing the state stumping for him.”

Actually, I believe Mr. Skinner might be a little jealous. After all, he does not have anyone to come stump for his candidates now, does he? Or maybe it is because if they did, they would lose?

Rush applauds Alexander for switch to the GOP

The great one himself weighed in on the Rodney Alexander switch, which has ignited a firestorm nationwide among the Democrats. As Rush explains, they had a very different reaction from a party switcher some time ago...

From Rushlimbaugh.com

RUSH: The Representative Rodney Alexander -- this was a great trick, by the way. (Wash Times) "Rep. Rodney Alexander's switch late Friday to the Republican Party brought swift and vitriolic responses among Democrats from the Bayou to the Beltway, including from his entire Washington staff that resigned in protest yesterday morning. 'He's a traitor,' fumed Andrew Koneschusky of the Louisiana Democratic Party. 'He betrayed the people who elected him to the U.S. Congress and the people who supported his re-election.'

"Particularly galling to Democrats was that the first-term lawmaker waited until 15 minutes before the state's filing deadline to switch his affiliation from Democrat to Republican, leaving Democrats no time to post strong opposition. 'A man of honor, as many before him have done, would have changed his party affiliation well before the filing deadline,' said Mr. Alexander's former whip, Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland. 'He would have had the courage to face a challenger and defend the failed policies promoted by his new party.'"

What is it with these people? Everybody ever heard of Jim Jeffords? Not only did Jumpin' Jim Jeffords not even do this, he got elected as a Republican and then changed parties at the behest of the Puffster, Tom Daschle. And it was a slick move, and it gave the Democrats the majority in the Senate when this happened. Not by virtue of what happened at the ballot box, but by virtue of internal scheming and maneuvering of the Democrats, led by Puff Daschle. And yet here they are just all out of whack over a House seat in Louisiana. Our plaudits go out to Representative Rodney Alexander. Hey, the aggressor sets the rules, and looks like these guys are playing by them.

Vitter is the sole Republican candidate in Senate race! (Congratulations!)

The deadline for qualifying has ended, ending all of the wait, the speculation, the question as to whether another Republican would enter the Senate race. Former Governor Buddy Roemer had been considering the race, but he did not ultimately throw his hat in the ring. Neither has any minor GOP candidates entered the fray, meaning David Vitter will be the sole recepient of any Republican votes cast.

This is a marvelous show of unity and it may be what tips this race over to the Republican side come this fall. Congratulations to Congressman Vitter, and we eagerly count the days until his victory!

Vitter, Dole at GOP convention in Lafayette

From The Lafayette Daily Advertiser

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole used much of her 40-minute speech at the Louisiana Republican Convention on Saturday to support U.S. Rep. David Vitter’s Senate campaign.

“You have to roll up your sleeves and work hard to get out the vote,” said Dole, R-N.C., in front of more than 1,000 delegates and guests at the Cajundome.

Dole encouraged the delegates to work for President Bush, as well as for Vitter, the Metairie congressman who is trying to be the first Republican U.S. senator from Louisiana in modern times.

She said the House Republican leadership is strong, but the party needs more power in the Senate.

“That’s why I’m here, to help elect the first Republican senator in the history of Louisiana,” she said.

Dole, a former labor secretary and head of the American Red Cross, praised Vitter’s work in Congress. She said he voted for legislation to clean up Lake Pontchartrain and save the coast, fought for better health care reform, and to clean up corruption and cronyism in the state.

“I think more than ever, we need the steady and principled leadership of David Vitter and George W. Bush,” she said.

Vitter is running against three major challengers, two of whom were in Lafayette on Saturday for a Frat-ernal Order of Police convention.

(snip)

Dole referred to the 5th Congressional District race while being careful to endorse neither of the Republican candidates, Jock Scott of Alexandria and Quitman incumbent Rodney Alexander, who switched his affiliation to the GOP just before qualifying for the race Friday. Democrat Zelma “Tisa” Blakes is also running.

“The 5th Congressional District will be represented by a Republican,” Dole said.

Dole got shouts of approval when she obliquely referred to gay marriage.

“Marriage between a man and a woman is not something the Republicans invented, but it’s something Republicans will defend,” she said.

Dole ended her speech by reciting a litany of accomplishments of George Bush, including education, Medicare and tax relief, ending each with the catch-phrase “and he delivered.”

“We lived through the ’90s and decided it was time for a change then, but now is not the time for a change,” she said.

Helen Garrett, a delegate from Rayne, said Dole’s speech was “wonderful” and more than she expected.

“I had met her before, but to have her come to Louisiana and have her talk about our president verified everything I heard and read about him,” she said. “And I thought her introduction of David Vitter was quite an honor to the state and will help him very much.”

Colorado Gov. Bill Owens was another main speaker of the day, and was also impressive, said Frank Barber, a volunteer for Paul deMahy’s run for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal.

“He said people put out 40 percent of their income in taxes — more than food, clothing, shelter and transportation, and wouldn’t it be better for Louisianians to have that money in their pockets?” Barber said. “He was a very strong speaker and a very effective communicator. I knew what he was all about within five minutes.”

Regardless of the reason, Alexander’s switch gives state Republicans hopes of changing the recent political moment.

The party suffered a series of reversals beginning with Alexander’s upset defeat of Republican Lee Fletcher and U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu’s re-election over GOP challenger Suzanne Haik Terrell in 2002. Even before Democrat Kathleen Blanco beat Republican Bobby Jindal last year for governor, some party members criticized the leadership’s inability to field candidates for statewide office, including agriculture commissioner and treasurer.

Republicans also were courting Alexander because of his voting record, including his support of the Medicare prescription drug program, the war in Iraq and President Bush’s tax cuts.

Since then, Alexander also has declined to endorse the Democratic ticket of John Kerry and John Edwards.

The National Journal ranked Alexander earlier this year among the 20 members whose votes last year placed them in the center of the House between conservative and liberal.

Part of the Republicans’ desire to court Alexander to switch parties comes from the narrow margin in the House. The GOP fills 229 seats while Democrats have 205 and an Independent holds one.

“I just don’t see much of a possibility that the Democrats can win the House and this is another reason why,” said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics. “This is a shot of adrenaline to the GOP and a downer for the Democrats.”

Notable state Democrats who switched parties:

* Former Gov. Mike Foster of Franklin switched to the GOP before winning the first of two terms in 1995.

* Former Gov. Buddy Roemer of Shreveport became a Republican before the “runoff from hell” in 1991.

* Former U.S. Rep. Jimmy Hayes of Lafayette joined the GOP after Republicans took control of the House in 1994.

* U.S. Rep. Billy Tauzin of Chackbay changed to the GOP, ducked the 1996 Senate race and became a powerful House committee chairman.

* State Sen. Craig Romero, former Iberia Parish president, hopes to succeed Tauzin in the 3rd Congressional District.

* Former House Speaker Hunt Downer’s switch to the GOP didn’t prevent him from running out of the money in the 2003 governor’s race.

Great Bayoubuzz commentary on Alexander switch, John Breaux

Commentary from Bayoubuzz.com

This is a fantastic piece from Mike Bayhem. I've highlighted a few sections that are particularly fascinating.

It´s not often you see Louisiana´ senior senator sporting a frown. Life has been very good to John Breaux, and the best might be yet to come when he retires from Congress and later reemerges as a top dollar DC lobbyist.

Elected to the US Congress while in his late twenties, Breaux has never tasted political defeat in person and only rarely by proxy. In 1986, the Crowley native took an uncharacteristic risk when he ran and defeated the favored Republican candidate for the US Senate, which has been his political nest for the past 18 years.

Since becoming a member of the US Senate, Breaux has fostered strong relations with his Republican colleagues while at the same time going from apprentice to usurper to former Governor and current convict Edwin Edwards en route to becoming master of the Louisiana Democratic Party.

(snip)

But something happened back home over the weekend that I bet wiped the smugness off of John Breaux´s face.

That something was the party switch of 5th District Congressman Rodney Alexander from the Democrats to the GOP.

The House member from the northeastern part of the state owed his political rise more to a fluke than the machinations of Breaux. Alexander was not expected to make a runoff, but due to the presence of three major Republican candidates in the open primary, the then Democratic state representative got enough votes to make a general election he was sure to lose. But as is usually the case when the Louisiana GOP is on the cusp of a major victory, party infighting resulted in a Alexander squeaker over the one candidate he had any chance against.

To put it another way, imagine a bizarre scenario in which a Republican somehow won mayor of Washington, DC.

Not long after winning, the conservative Alexander was being courted to switch, but he demurred, ascertaining his allegiance to the party that believed in him and that made his election possible. And then reality paid Mr. Alexander a visit in the guise of John Kerry.

The 5th District is a very conservative area where the Massachusetts nominee is not expected to do well. The thought of sharing an informal ticket spot with a proverbial anchor was troubling. Even more so was that the GOP decided to offer up a challenger to him.

All of a sudden Congressman Alexander began wondering if yet another upset in the 5th District could be in the making, except this time he would be on the short end of the headline in the post-election edition of the Monroe News Star.

When Alexander came to the decision to switch parties, nobody knows. However, we do know that he waited for the last possible moment to play Cassius, thus preventing a stunned Democratic Party from being able to field a candidate against the "Quisling from Quitman".

The Alexander defection is an embarrassment to the national Democratic Party, since one of their own congressman decided to bolt rather than risk being associated with their presidential nominee, an omen of a looming Kerry wipeout in the South.

Alexander´s calculated gambit is an enormous slap at the Don Corleone of the Louisiana Democratic Party, especially since Breaux did not learn about it until after the fact.

John Breaux might be served two more indignities before he finishes his last lap in the upper chamber if his handpicked successor Congressman Chris John is unable to make a runoff and if Republican Congressman David Vitter triumphs where so many other GOP candidates have faltered.

A dour John Breaux means happy days for the Louisiana Republican Party, with neither happening often enough.

Elizabeth Dole stumps for Vitter

From The News Star

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole used much of her 40-minute speech at the Louisiana Republican Convention on Saturday to support U.S. Rep. David Vitter's Senate campaign.

"You have to roll up your sleeves and work hard to get out the vote," said Dole, R-N.C., in front of more than 1,000 delegates and guests at the Cajundome.

Dole encouraged the delegates to work for President Bush, as well as for Vitter, the Metairie congressman who is trying to be the first Republican U.S. senator from Louisiana in modern times.

She said the House Republican leadership is strong, but the party needs more power in the Senate.

Dole, a former labor secretary and head of the American Red Cross, praised Vitter's work in Congress. She said he voted for legislation to clean up Lake Pontchartrain and save the coast, fought for better health-care reform and to clean up corruption and cronyism in the state.

"I think more than ever, we need the steady and principled leadership of David Vitter and George W. Bush," she said.

Vitter is running against three major challengers, two of whom were in Lafayette on Saturday for a Fraternal Order of Police convention.

More on the Rodney Alexander switch

From The News Star

Fifth District U.S. Rep. Rodney Alexander switched to the Republican Party late Friday afternoon, saying he felt excluded by the Democratic Party and can do more to help his district as a Republican.

The freshman congressman, a conservative "Blue Dog Democrat" since being elected, said it had become obvious to him that "part of the party that had supported him in the past wasn't going to be there for me now."

Many in the Democratic leadership were angry because he didn't attend the Democratic National Convention in Boston last week or endorse Democratic nominee U.S. Sen. John Kerry, Alexander said.

Republicans welcomed Alexander to their ranks, including President George Bush, who telephoned Alexander on Friday.

"President Bush just welcomed me aboard and said he was looking forward to working with us to help both the district and the country become stronger," said Alexander, R-Quitman.

State Rep. Kay Katz, R-Monroe, reached just before she was to introduce Michael Reagan at the Louisiana Republican Convention in Lafayette on Friday night, said she was "very thrilled that (Alexander) has changed parties."

"I certainly think as the incumbent he'll get a lot of support," said Katz, a National Republican Committeewoman.

(snip)

There was speculation in March that Alexander had been promised a seat on the powerful Appropriations Committee by the majority Republican leadership if he switched parties.

Alexander said he wants that seat, especially since Appropriations Committee member U.S. Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, is giving up his House seat to run for the U.S. Senate. But Alexander was coy when pressed about commitments to him from the Republican leadership.

"I'm not at liberty to give specifics at this time, but I believe the 5th District will benefit from my decision," Alexander said.

Alexander, 57, changed his registration from Democrat to Republican at the Jackson Parish Courthouse on Friday, then drove to Baton Rouge to requalify for his November re-election bid. He originally qualified Wednesday as a Democrat.

"I don't think they've ever had to do that before, so it looks like I qualified twice," Alexander said.

(snip)

Political analysts said Alexander's move was politically savvy in the conservative 5th District.

"This seals the deal for him; it's his seat for as long as he wants it," said Gordon Harvey, a political historian at the University of Louisiana at Monroe. "This has always been a Republican district on paper. His election in 2002 was a huge upset, but it was an open seat then. Now he has the power of incumbency."

Pearson Cross, an assistant professor of government at ULM, said Alexander is joining the party with which his philosophies have always aligned.

"He was in some since one of the last of a dying breed - a conservative southern Democrats," Cross said. "The Blue Dogs are almost extinct."

Alexander said he hasn't changed his philosophy - only his party. "The Democratic Party invites you under its umbrella, but if you don't agree with everything then you're not welcome," Alexander said. "They pushed me out from under the umbrella."

Louisiana Republicans unite at Lafayette Convention

I've highlighted a key section of this story that I think is particularly interesting.

FromThe Times Picayune

The Louisiana Republican Party sought to unite its ranks around President Bush's re-election bid and David Vitter's campaign for Senate while shrugging off years of debilitating internal division by throwing its first convention in eight years at the Cajundome this weekend.

The event drew about 1,100 registered delegates Friday and Saturday to a pep-rally atmosphere where attendees heard speeches by nationally recognized Republican figures such as North Carolina Sen. Elizabeth Dole and broadcast personality Michael Reagan, the brother of President Reagan.

Although the party made no endorsements in races in which Republicans are competing against one another in fall elections, the event served as a launching point for grass-roots efforts. The Sept. 18 ballot, for example, will feature a statewide vote for a GOP-backed proposal enshrining heterosexual marriage in the state Constitution as the only recognized form of marital union. That will be followed by the Nov. 2 election for president, an open Senate seat and several competitive races for congressional seats in Louisiana.

For the Louisiana races, a Dec. 4 runoff will decide the winner if no candidate gets a majority of the votes in the Nov. 2 primary.

What made this weekend's meeting unusual was that the state GOP had a major Senate candidate the party could drop balloons on before the primary.

"I am the only candidate in this race who's a Republican," said Vitter, a Congressman from Metairie serving the 1st District and the final marquee speaker Saturday afternoon.

The state has not sent a Republican senator to Washington since Reconstruction. Louisiana's open primary system lets multiple candidates from all political parties run against one another, and the GOP's past efforts to make endorsements or weed out the field before the primary have been mostly unsuccessful and sometimes embarrassing.

(snip)

Part of the party's healing strategy was to build unity around Bush's re-election bid, Vitter's campaign and certain political issues, such as the "one man, one woman" constitutional amendment.

In the Senate race, recent polls indicate Vitter leads each of his three Democratic challengers: U.S. Rep. Chris John of Crowley, state Treasurer John Kennedy and New Orleans state Rep. Arthur Morrell. The three Democrats' combined numbers, however, exceed Vitter's. Nearly everyone expects a hard-fought runoff. The last time Louisiana voted on an open Senate seat, in 1996, Landrieu beat Republican Woody Jenkins by only 5,788 votes.

In his speech Saturday, Vitter acknowledged the state party's difficult history.

"Our success in the past wasn't everything it could have been because our grass-roots effort wasn't everything it needed to be," Vitter said.

Now, he said, the party is better situated than it's ever been to get organized and put a Republican in the Senate.

"Let's make history," he said.

A notable sideshow at the convention was the newly reformed race for the 5th Congressional District. Incumbent freshman Rep. Rodney Alexander switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party in the last official hour of qualifying Friday afternoon, blindsiding and infuriating Democrats. The Democrats still have a candidate in the race, Monroe businesswoman Zelma "Tisa" Blakes, but she is virtually unknown.

David Vitter welcomes Rep. Rodney Alexander to the Republican Party

Today, Congressman Rodney Alexander decided to switch parties. He returned to Baton Rouge just before qualifying ended and refiled as a Republican.

Alexander represents half of Northern Louisiana, from Monroe down to just north of Baton Rouge. He is a first term incumbent and is far more conservative than most of his fellow Democrats. He has also refused to support John Kerry's candidacy as president. His switch will put Louisiana's congressional delegation at 5 Republican, 2 Democrat.

(Now if we can just take Chris John's seat...)

Immediately following Alexander's switch, David Vitter's campaign sent out this press release:

For Immediate Release Contact: Mac Abrams
August 6, 2004 (504) 833-1163

David Vitter Welcomes Rodney Alexander to the Republican Party

"I am excited to welcome Rodney Alexander to the Republican Party and
endorse him for Congress in the Fifth District. Over the years, Rodney
and I
have worked closely together, first in the Louisiana legislature and
now in
the U.S. Congress. I have been extremely impressed with his tireless
and
endless work for the people of the Fifth Congressional District.

In Congress, Rodney is someone who has stood up for conservative
principals
and Louisiana values. Unfortunately, the Washington Democratic
leadership
does not share these values. I look forward to helping and working
with
Rodney Alexander in the coming months as he begins his legislative
career in
the majority party of Congress. I know it will be a long, very
distinguished and productive career for Louisiana," said David Vitter.

John Maginnis: GOP unites (Plus polls showing Vitter in lead!)

From The Times Picayune.

In the U.S. Senate race, the good news for Republicans will be no news -- that is, no new candidates to fracture the rare solidarity they have achieved with U.S. Rep. David Vitter of Metairie.

Leading Democrats who once pressed for a single candidate are by now resigned to a three-way competition among U.S. Rep. Chris John of Crowley, state Treasurer John Kennedy of Madisonville and state Rep. Arthur Morrell of New Orleans. Retiring Sen. John Breaux and his Democratic colleagues in Washington are behind John, but they will be just as behind Kennedy if the voters put him in the runoff instead. The best man will survive.

(snip)

Perhaps because so many GOP candidates were killed off in the last Senate and governor's races, Vitter emerged alone and early, and party leaders, including his fellow Republican congressmen, quickly closed ranks behind him.

(snip)

Though Republicans are generally pleased or, at least, relieved, to have a single formidable GOP contender, some still wonder if he's the right one. Up until a few weeks ago, some big Republican contributors continued to hold out hope that former gubernatorial candidate Bobby Jindal would run for the Senate instead of the House. Jindal has never wavered from his campaign for the seat Vitter is vacating in the 1st Congressional District, though one poll suggests he has aimed too low.

An independent statewide poll taken in July showed Vitter leading Kennedy, 43-36 percent, and John, 42-34 percent, in separate trial-heat runoffs. When the pollster allotted the undecided black respondents to the Democrats, which is logical, Vitter led Kennedy by four points and John by three. A toss-up.

Yet the same survey shows Jindal way ahead of either Democrat, leading Kennedy 56-31 percent and John 55-31 percent. Of course, name recognition is a factor. Jindal is known to 90 percent of voters, compared to two-thirds knowing Vitter and Kennedy and less than half John. Yet pollster Verne Kennedy (no relation to the candidate) concludes that the further Jindal gets from last year's governor's race, the more popular he becomes.

Polls can't foretell a candidate's performance. It's reasonable to predict that Vitter will be more combative than Jindal was in the crunch and more acceptable to the most conservative rural whites.

One doesn't know what private agreements were made between them last year when Vitter endorsed Jindal from the crowded field of Republicans. And Jindal could have felt that one wrenching statewide race in two years was enough. The polls show him cruising to an election to Congress, from which perch he could run for statewide office in the future, though who knows when or if the right opportunity will present itself again.

Though some in the party won't be satisfied with the solidarity that has long eluded them, for once they have a contender no other Republican wants to fight. They can save that for the Democrats.

Mean spirited Dems savage Vitter

From Bayoubuzz.com

David Vitter continues to scare the dickens of the Louisiana Democratic Party. Today they sent out a press release that borders on the hysterical. Recently, Vitter announced his move to Alexandria. Well, the Dems had a few choice words to say about that. It is impossible for me to cite this and not comment on it directly, so here we go:

Today, Senate candidate David Vitter, an elite, New Orleans born career politician, moves into an Alexandria house for the month of August, signing himself up for a crash course on the people and issues of Central Louisiana. Alexandria residents are reacting, voicing their objections to candidate Vitter whose disingenuous move further demonstrates just how out of touch he is with the people of the state and the values of Louisianaians.

This is absolutely rich. Where do we begin?

First off, "an elite, New Orleans born career politician?" What, the Democrats are criticizing New Orleans? The place where they get most of their votes? The place that elects Bill Jefferson to Congress and will likely never elect a Republican? The place that brought us the Morials and the Landrieus?

What they really resent is not New Orleans proper, but the suburbs to the west and north of the city, like Jefferson and St. Tammany Parish, home to Vitter's heavily Republican congressional district. But let's put semantics aside. The Democrats are say "New Orleans" to turn rural voters off from Vitter. This is incredibly disingenuous, as the Democrats need New Orleans as a wellspring of votes to get their candidates into office.

Secondly, what's this "elite" business? This from the party whose presidential nominee has a family fortune, along with his wife, of about 525 million? Whose vice presidential candidate made a killing as a trial lawyer? And how about those swank Hollywood parties that even our local Democrats went to at the Democratic Convention in Boston?

Now we have "career politician." That is ridiculous on its face. Vitter, while in the state legislature, championed term limits for our legislators. He has served only two full terms in the House, as opposed to Chris John's four. He is leaving a secure House seat to potentially lose political office altogether in a (you have to admit) risky bid for the Senate in a state that has never elected a Republican senator.

Here's some more from the release:

Vitter’s record on workers’ issues came under fire this week coinciding with the visit of Labor Secretary and fellow Washington Republican Elaine Chao. Vitter has voted numerous times against extending unemployment benefits, severing the only lifeline for thousands of Lousianaians actively searching for work in a struggling economy. Vitter has also opposed raising the minimum wage and sided with the Bush administration against protecting overtime pay for Louisiana’s workers.

If Louisiana's economy is struggling, they should look to the state's oppressive tax structure and corrupt image as a factor. Extending unemployment benefits again and again will not help Louisianans find work. Raising the minimum wage would cause businesses to drop jobs or make it harder for prospective workers to apply, because employers will have to pay more for their service. Vitter voted for real economic stimulus for our state and the country. He and President Bush understand that when you let more people keep their own money, they will stimulate the economy in various ways, by making purchases, starting businesses, you name it. Our own state government's economic plans, by comparison, are larthargic. Why doesn't the state Democratic party think up better ideas at the state level instead of whining?

Here's one final piece of the release:

“If David Vitter had represented Louisiana while in Congress instead of siding with Washington Republicans, he wouldn’t need to move to Alexandria in an attempt to save his political hide,” noted resident Suzie Butler, a former investigative journalist. “David Vitter is out of touch with the values of Louisianaians and no act of political theater is going to change that fact. In addition to being out of touch, after this election, David Vitter will also be out of sight and out of mind.”

Recent polling has shown Vitter ahead of both John Kennedy and Chris John in possible runoffs, so actually he is in good shape. Vitter need not worry about his "political hide."

The Democrats are playing ugly, using the politics of class envy to divide us as a state. The party that gave us Edwin Edwards is turning on the man who had the courage to oppose the now jailed former governor and his corrupt administration. They will pull every trick possible to convince Louisianans that Vitter is an elite, rich, uncaring Republican. Well, it is time the truth be told. The Democrats have taxed our state into economic oblivion, muddied our image with corrupt politicians, and exploited our state's working class into wellsprings of votes to keep them in office. Now they have Kerry-Edwards as their presidential ticket, and are trying to pass them off as heroes to working Louisianans.

These people are utter phonies. They're not interested in your well being, only your vote. Then, you can do whatever until the next election. Let's not buy into their game again this fall.

Vitter tops in fundraising

Story from The Times Picayune.

WASHINGTON -- With qualifying for congressional and some local races beginning today, U.S. Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, continues to outpace his three Democratic opponents in raising money for the U.S. Senate campaign, according to the latest financial disclosure reports.

The reports, reflecting activity through July 16, show that Vitter has raised $2.59 million and has $3.2 million in the bank for the race to replace Sen. John Breaux, who is retiring.

(snip)

Although voters may not yet be focusing on the Senate race, the disclosure reports show that "those writing the checks are paying a lot of attention," said Ed Renwick, director of Loyola University's Institute of Politics.

"That's a lot of money to have in the bank so early in the campaign," Renwick said of Vitter's and John's totals.

But Renwick said both candidates, as House members representing one-seventh of the state, don't enjoy widespread name recognition across the state, one category in which they are trailing Kennedy, who has won two statewide elections. They'll need to advertise heavily to gain that recognition, he said.

"And that will take a lot of cash," Renwick said.

The breakdown of contributions shows Vitter received 81 percent of his donations from individuals, and 19 percent from political action committees, which represent corporations and other interest groups. John received 70 percent from individuals and 30 percent from PACs; Kennedy had 94 percent from individuals and 6 percent from PACs.

Vitter loaned his campaign $95,000, and Kennedy loaned his $250,000, according to the candidates' disclosure reports. John listed no loans in his report.

If no candidate gets more than 50 percent of the vote in the November primary, a runoff will be held Dec. 4 between the top two vote-getters.

Republicans now are united behind Vitter. Some of the Democratic establishment, led by Breaux and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, is backing John, but Kennedy and Morrell have said they are in the race to stay.

Chris John calls abortion, gay marriage "divisive"

Today, Rep. Chris John qualified as a candidate to run for the Senate seat being vacated by Senator John Breaux. In remarks broadcast over local radio stations, he made it clear he would not be dealing with the hot button socially conservative issues such as abortion and gay marriage. He said they were "divisive" and these issues are matters that are "private" between people.

Apparently John has picked up on the Democratic talking points to refer to gay marriage and abortion as "divisive" or "wedge" issues. Noticably, the Democratic convention made almost no mention of these issues.

I find the "private" quote from his statement interesting. That is language usually used by the pro-abortion lobby. What is Chris John implying here?

So can pro-life, pro-family Louisianans expect much from Chris John? The answer: "Probably not."

Alexandria gets new resident: Vitter

“The Vitter family is excited about spending August in Alexandria. Central Louisiana is an important and often over looked region of our state. I will use this time to learn and better understand the issues facing Alexandria and the rest of Cenla,” said David Vitter.

Vitter, his wife Wendy, and four children will celebrate their move to Alexandria with a welcome party at his August home in Alexandria. The welcome party will be on Wednesday, August 4th from 6-8 p.m. at 212 Eola Avenue. The public is invited.

WHO: U.S. Congressman David Vitter and Family

WHAT: Welcome to Alexandria Party

WHEN: 6 p.m., Wednesday, August 4

WHERE: 212 Eola Avenue

Directions-

Off 28 West headed to Tunk´s

Turn left on Heyman Lane
Turn Right onto Coliseum Blvd

Turn Left on Eola Drive

Vitter ready to qualify as a candidate for U.S. Senate

Vitter to Qualify for U.S. Senate Race on Wednesday

(Metairie, La.) – U.S. Congressman David Vitter, the Republican candidate for the United States Senate, will qualify for the United States Senate Race on Wednesday, August 4, 2004 at 10:00 a.m. His wife Wendy and their four children will join Vitter as he qualifies at the State Capitol Building.

WHO: U.S. Congressman David Vitter and Family

WHAT: Qualifying for U.S. Senate

WHEN: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, August 4

WHERE: State Capitol Building, 20th Floor