On November 2nd, 2004, Congressman David Vitter won the seat of retiring senator John Breaux. Vitter Blog's mission is now complete, and we acknowledge and honor the hard work of all that worked to elect Louisiana's first Republican senator since Reconstruction. With that, we now turn our attention to other blogs, who will be documenting the races in their states.

Saturday, July 31, 2004

Novak: Chris John shows, others don't

Robert Novak notes in his latest column that Louisiana's own Chris John had no problem appearing at the Democratic convention in Boston, unlike other Democrats running for Senate. Hey, if he wants to share the spotlight with Kerry and Edwards, be my guest...

SOUTHERN EXPOSURE

Rep. Chris John of Louisiana was a rare candidate for a closely contested Senate seat in a conservative state to show up at the Democratic National Convention. Polls show John running in a tight battle for second place to make the runoff in Louisiana's non-party election.

Other Democratic Senate candidates running in states overwhelmingly carried by George W. Bush in 2000 were nowhere near Boston: Former Alaska Gov. Tony Knowles, South Carolina Education Commissioner Inez Tenenbaum, Erskine Bowles of North Carolina and Rep. Brad Carson of Oklahoma.


Full article here.

Friday, July 30, 2004

Kerry throws in towel in Louisiana, pulls ads

Given the recent poll showing Bush trouncing Kerry by sixteen points in Louisiana, the Kerry campaign has pulled advertising for the state.

From Politicsla.com

It's now officially over in Louisiana but it was really over five months ago: President George W. Bush was assured of carrying the state as soon as Sen. John Kerry emerged as the presumptive Democrat nominee. Officially over because Democrats have pulled any organized ad campaign for Kerry and even Republicans have dispatched party workers from Louisiana to hotter campaign spots.

A recent poll confirmed this, with Bush having an almost insurmountable lead in the state. One must wonder what Democrat strategists were thinking as Bush never showed signs of vulnerability here and raises questions about how effective a campaign Kerry's staff runs.

(snip)

In this environment, while a Kerry landslide is next to impossible, there's an increasing likelihood that Bush may score one. Kerry's writing off the state should minimally affect candidacies of lower-level national Democrats since most have tried to keep their distance from his candidacy. But what would the implications be for Louisiana candidates with a big Bush win nationwide?

This scenario could ensure that, by 2005, the only nationally-elected officials would come from New Orleans, Rep. Bill Jefferson and Sen. Mary Landrieu. The Democrat base will come out to support Kerry even if Bush is expected to do well in the state, but as the president's margin nationwide increases, more of them will stay home out of discouragement. The blanket primary and general (runoff) election date after the national date makes Democrats more competitive here than any in other state in the South, but it can't work miracles.

As of today, count Republicans Bobby Jindal, Jim McCrery, and Richard Baker as sure winners, along with Democrat Jefferson in the House. Republican Billy Tauzin III also is looking good and in a Bush landslide environment might well win without a runoff, but regardless is a likely winner. For this level, the place Democrats would be hurt most is where they currently hold seats, the Fifth (open) and Seventh (held by Rep. Rodney Alexander).

Polls currently place two Democrats slightly ahead in the Seventh. But if the Democrat base turns out in reduced numbers that increases the chances that state Sen. Don Cravins will make the runoff since more liberal black voters, especially goaded by political organizations, would be less likely to slough off. This would open the trap door for state Sen. Willie Mount to fall through and put either Charles Boustany or David Thibodeaux up against Cravins - and whoever runs against him will win in December.

Alexander has the incumbency advantage but also one of the most cross-wise districts in the entire country - the winning Democrat whose own vote was farthest behind his district's vote for Bush. Against former legislator Republican Jock Scott, he has a chance to retain this district only if Kerry stays competitive nationwide.

Perhaps most affected by a Kerry meltdown would be the Senate seat. Rep. David Vitter is in the runoff and, as of now, if there is one against either Rep. Chris John or state Treasurer John Kennedy, separated from other national trends by the late election date, it'll be close. But if enough discouraged Democrats stay home, Vitter can win it outright in November or, more remotely, state Rep. Arthur Morrell could sneak into the runoff for the same reasons Cravins would make it in the Seventh. Vitter would win that matchup handily.

So even if the presidential race seems over here, how it plays out nationwide may have a profound impact on other national elections in Louisiana.

Wednesday, July 28, 2004

Chris John responds



Well it did not take too long for Chris John to respond to Vitter's press release. The congressman really did not say much, mostly the usual pap about his being "independent," etc, etc.

Anyway, here are some quotes.

”David Vitter is arguing campaign slogans and TV ads and making superficial comparisons. I am tackling the important issues our state and our country are facing. If David Vitter is opposed to a strong America that begins right here in Louisiana, he is just as out of touch with Louisianians as his voting record suggests.


Actually, I believe Vitter's point was that your campaign is mimicking Kerry's messages and slogans. The notion that Vitter opposes "a strong America that begins at home" is absurd.

Here's another quote:

David Vitter has been a rubber stamp since he arrived in Washington and put himself at the beck and call of his Washington Republican masters. David Vitter was a rubber stamp for the White House 96 percent of the time last year and the House Republican leadership 99 percent of the time. He even rubberstamped giving government contracts to companies that move their headquarters overseas to avoid paying taxes.”


Hey, if you alleviate some business taxes you might get those companies to move on back. Oh yes, I forgot, those would be "tax cuts for the rich."

It is amusing to listen to John ridicule Vitter for being "at the beck and call of his Washington Republican masters." Chris John was certainly taking the orders of his Democratic masters when he voted against the anti-UN funding legislation in the House, a vote that he still refuses to explain.

Bottom line: Chris John is employing the same class warfare rheortic that is prevalent in Kerry and Edwards' speeches. If he thinks we should trust him as senator when he embraces this liberal ticket, he's about to learn an important lesson: You are judged by the company you keep. Right now, John is keeping no company with conservatives.

Full article here.

Tuesday, July 27, 2004

Vitter campaign links Chris John to John Kerry

As Louisiana's Democrats meet in Boston to nominate John Kerry, Congressman Vitter is taking the opportunity to show Louisiana voters how close in ideology Chris John and John Kerry really are. It is no secret that Chris John supports Kerry for president, so naturally the John campaign should not be offended that Vitter is pointing out the similarities. Or will they? It'll be interesting to see what they have to say.
Here are two press releases from the Vitter campaign:

For Immediate Release
CONTACT: Mac Abrams
(504) 833-1163
July 26, 2004

Chris John in Boston
Day 1: Strategy

(Metairie, LA) As the Democratic National Convention begins with Chris John in attendance, there is little doubt who the Washington liberal establishment wants to be Louisiana’s next senator. For evidence, look no further than one of John Kerry’s ads running in Louisiana. At the end of his War on Terror ad, John Kerry states that “a strong America begins at home.” If that slogan sounds familiar, it is the same slogan that Chris John is using for his U.S. Senate campaign.

“It's sure disappointing that Chris John is using the same campaign slogan as John Kerry. At this crucial time for Louisiana, we need more than a follower or rubber stamp--particularly someone who follows a Massachusetts liberal and the national liberal establishment. We need a leader--strong, independent, conservative, fighting for Louisiana,” said David Vitter.

See for Yourself How Chris John and John Kerry Share the Same Slogan

Go to http://www.johnkerry.com/videos/ and click on the July 7, 2004, War on Terror Ad.

Go to www.chrisjohn.com and look at the website header and various press releases; including 7/14 and 7/13.


Chris John in Boston

Day 2: Fundraising

(Metairie, LA) As the Democratic National Convention begins another day with Chris John in attendance, there is little doubt who the Washington and Hollywood special interest groups want to be Louisiana’s next senator. For evidence, look no further than the non-partisan Center For Responsive Politics website, www.opensecrets.org, and last night’s convention party thrown by Chris John.

After reviewing his FEC Report, www.opensecrets.org lists Chris John as the No.1 Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives (third overall) in contributions from Political Action Committees. This trend towards special interest money for Chris John is likely to continue after his big party last night in Boston. After listening to liberal icons Bill and Hillary Clinton, Chris John hosted a party attended by various Hollywood stars, entertainment provided by the Goo Goo Dolls, and event staffers dressed as Gargoyles.

“It's a shame that Washington and Hollywood insiders do not think I am the best candidate for their special interests. However, I am very proud that an overwhelming majority of my contributions have come from individuals right here in the Pelican State,” said David Vitter, Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate.

“At this crucial time for Louisiana, we need more than a follower or rubber stamp--particularly someone who follows Washington and Hollywood special interests. We need a leader--strong, independent, conservative, fighting for Louisiana,” added Vitter.

The Facts on Chris John and his Special Interests

Chris John has received more PAC money than any other Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives.
(www.opensecrets.org/overview/toppac.asp?Cycle=2004&Display=S&Type=M2)

Chris John has received almost 40% of his campaign funding from PAC contributions, compared to 16% for David Vitter (www.opensecrets.org/races/summary.asp?ID=LAS2&Cycle=2004)

Information on Chris John’s Boston Party can be obtained through the non-partisan website, www.nationaljournal.com, through their convention daily email updates.

Monday, July 26, 2004

Louisiana is Dubya Country: President trounces Kerry in latest LA poll!

President Bush hits it big in latest poll!

Courtesy of The Times Picayune

Apparently because of advertising, President George Bush has moved back into a commanding double-digit lead in Louisiana over Democrat John Kerry in a new poll, erasing a last spring's slight uptick in the challenger's standing.

The new poll by Pensacola-based Marketing Research Institute — based on surveys of 600 Louisiana voters in mid-July — has good news for Bush in a state that both campaigns had earlier unexpectedly designated a battleground. It shows him with a 16-point, 54 percent to 38 percent lead over Kerry, narrowing only slightly if Democratic Vice Presidential candidate John Edwards and undecided blacks are added in. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percent.

(snip)

In another key result from Kennedy's survey, Louisiana's U.S. Senate race remains largely unchanged from earlier polls, with Republican U.S. Rep. David Vitter (36 percent) holding a lead over Democratic challengers John Kennedy, the state treasurer (19 percent), and U.S. Rep. Chris John (18 percent). State Rep. Arthur Morrell had 6 percent.

"Right now the Senate race is not about issues. It's about candidates and name recognition," Kennedy said. "It's still in an early phase."

Louisiana Dems shamelessly politicize 9/11 commission

Congressman Vitter must be a real dynamo to invite the piling on by some of Louisiana's top Democrats. Today they unloaded on Vitter, claiming he voted against the creation of the 9/11 commission. I guess running a positive campaign is out of the question, no?

Anyway, here are excerpts of what they said.

“The 9/11 Commission’s bi-partisan efforts exposed failings in the system that need serious attention”, said Mike Skinner, Chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party. “Why David Vitter opposed an open and independent inquiry to make our nation more secure baffles me.”

I suppose putting together an independent commission to coincide with an election year fits your fancy, Mr. Skinner. One of the major concerns with this commission, among quite a few Republicans, is that it would be a political football in an election year, which in your case, seems to have been bourne out by your swift haste to pound Congressman Vitter for cheap political hay.

“David Vitter was wrong to oppose the creation of the Commission,” said Derek Wooley, Executive Director of the Louisiana Democratic Party. “David Vitter is also wrong for Louisiana and wrong for our country.”


Coming from the party that has offered John "it's better to be liked by Jacques Chirac than to be strong" Kerry and John "let's sue doctors into bankruptcy" Edwards up for their ticket this fall, I do not consider such comments from this bunch to be an insult.

And hey, how about Chris John's vote on the UN? Real Louisiana values there, huh?

Anyway, here's what the Vitter campaign had to say:

Congressman David Vitter’s Communications Director, Mac Abrams, has responded with the following statement, “Congressman Vitter would be glad to debate the issues of homeland security but we will not play politics regarding 9/11.


Our Democratic friends like to ask questions of Vitter regarding this matter. Well, I have some for them.

Why did Jamie Gorelick continue to serve on the commission even after Attorney General John Ashcroft identified her as the author of a memo that installed a wall between intelligence agencies? Why was she asking questions when she should have been answering them?

Why did former Senator Bob Kerrey treat Richard Clarke with such reverence and credibility when he has been exposed as being hypocritical in blasting the Bush administration for not being strong on fighting terrorism, when in a Fox News briefing, he claimed that the Bush administration had beefed up plans to deal with Al Qaida and Osama bin Laden before 9/11?

How much of the 9/11 report has been compromised as a result of Sandy Berger's alleged thefts of classified documents?

Why did the 9/11 commission dismiss the videotape of Bill Clinton explaining that he turned down Sudan's offer of Osama bin Laden because he was a "hot potato," and that he pled with the Saudis to take him?

And finally, how do these Democrats say with any credibility that they're for beefing up intelligence when their presidential standardbearer has a history of voting to gut our intelligence, even over and beyond what Ted Kennedy could take? I find it interesting that you are so concerned about "failings" in our intelligence system, considering members of your party have time and again put up barriers that made intelligence sharing difficult, if not impossible. (The aforementioned Gorelick memo, the Toricelli principle, etc.)

Full article, courtesy of bayoubuzz.com, here.

Friday, July 23, 2004

Chris John (again) misleads Louisianans on Vitter record

To quote a great American president: There you go again.

Now Chris John is attempting to portray Congressman Vitter as cold hearted toward our troops. Here are the exchanges, courtesy of Bayoubuzz.com

According to a press release from John, yesterday “in the U.S. House Vitter voted to block $500 million in funding for the expansion of military housing, part of a $10 billion military construction bill”.

John stated “Our men and women in uniform are offering the ultimate sacrifice overseas. The least we can do is keep the home fires burning warm for their families.”

Vitter has a different take. After receiving the Chris John press release, Vitter said, “Today, Chris John is attempting to distort the truth once again. In a unanimous display of support, the U.S. House of Representatives passed, and I voted for, the Military Housing Improvement Act (Roll Call Vote 409, 423-0).”

“The vote that Chris John sites in his press release was a procedural vote. In reality, the vote that Chris John brags about was a vote to delay consideration of the Military Construction Appropriations bill, which includes significant funding for Louisiana bases. As a member of the subcommittee, I have fought for these Louisiana projects and I do not see the benefit in delaying this funding to try and score a political point”, stated Vitter.


Vitter also pointed out that John had voted to delay funding on several military projects.

Congressman John is certainly a chatty one this week. Think he'll have something to say about his UN vote?

Full article here.

Vitter leads solidly in latest poll, Chris John not making runoff!

The great website Politicsla.com just came out with some polling data on the senate race. Apparently Chris John's negative attacks on Vitter aren't winning him enough support to overtake state treasurer John Kennedy for the second runoff spot. It's also great to know that voters aren't blindly following Senator Breaux's lead and flocking to his hand picked successor.

Here's an ominous piece of history for John. His predecesor, Rep. Jimmy Hayes, also ran for the Senate, and ultimately failed to make the runoff. Will John follow in his footsteps?

Breaking News - New Poll Numbers
During the week of July 12 six-hundred likely voters were polled by Dr. Verne Kennedy of Market Research Institute. With a 4% margin of error, the results are as follows:

U.S. Senate Race
U.S. Rep. David Vitter (R) 36%
State Treasurer John Kennedy (D) 19%
U.S. Rep. Chris John (D) 18%
State Rep. Arthur Morrell (D) 6%
Undecided 21%

With Vitter being the only Repulican candidate in the race, his lead has stayed steady. The Democratic candidates are still fighting to rouse up support amoung their base. Retiring U.S. Senator John Breaux recently endorsed John to fill his seat. Although John leads his Democrat counterparts in fundraising, there is no "Breaux Bounce" to help him shake up Kennedy's small lead.

Wednesday, July 21, 2004

Where is Chris John on UN vote?



So where is Chris John's explanation for his vote against legislation to ban federal funding for any United Nations observance of our presidential election? So far there's barely been a peep about this from the John campaign.

If anyone knows what John has had to say on this, please let us know. We always have an open ear here and we would like to know why the good congressman cast his vote with the Michael Moore wing of the Democratic Party.

Tuesday, July 20, 2004

Vitter Blog applauds Cain run



As you may know, Vitter Blog is not the only blog dedicated to a conservative candidate running for the Senate. One of them covers Herman Cain, a black businessman running for the GOP nomination in Georgia to succeed retiring senator Zell Miller. The goal for the primary was to make sure no one secured 50% of the vote, in this case the frontrunner, Rep. Johnny Isakson.

Sadly, that did not happen.

Isakson won the first primary with about 53% of the vote, meaning that a runoff will not happen, and he will go on to be the Republican nominee for Georgia's open senate seat. Although Isakson is generally conservative, he has a pro-abortion past that has rankled some among the conservative faithful. Herman Cain, on the other hand, won support for his strong moral leadership and dedication to conservative principles.

As of now, Isakson will likely go on to beat Democrat Denise Majette and become Georgia's next senator, marking the first time Georgia will have two elected Republican senators. We hope Mr. Isakson stays true to Georgia's conservative principles and not become another Arlen Specter or Olympia Snowe. If he does, he will likely make a good senator.

We wish Herman Cain well and congratulate him on a bold intitative into politics, and we hope he turns up again in a future race. To the Cain supporters on Cain Blog, we wish it could have turned out better. But we would do well to remember that defeat can sometimes lay the seeds for tomorrow's victory. And as Cain said tonight, "I will be back."

Monday, July 19, 2004

Rush Limbaugh comments on recent House vote



Today, Rush talked about the House vote that took place Thursday on an amendment that would have banned U.S. funding for a United Nations observence of our presidential elections. This was the amendment that Chris John voted against, much to the surprise of Louisianans. So far, Congressman John has not made a full statement on why he voted the way he did. The congressman is not mentioned by Rush, but the company he has kept by voting with them is discussed by the talk show host.

RUSH: All right, so you people know, last week I told you all about this. We had this sound bite from Corinne Brown. Eddie Bernice Johnson, this is a move led by the Congressional Black Caucus to petition Kofi Annan of the United Nations, the nations organization that sits around and watches a genocide in Uganda and does nothing, currently watching a genocide in the Sudan, does nothing, can't do anything, screws up the oil-for-food program -- doesn't screw it up, corrupts it on purpose, perhaps one of the most corrupt organizations in the world because two-thirds of the membership is tyrannical dictators and thugs, and the Congressional Black Caucus wants the UN to monitor the U.S. election in November so it will be "fair." So Steve Buyer, great congressman from Indiana, put together an amendment. I want to read it to you -- and they voted on the amendment, and the vote is what's stunning but I want to read to you Buyer's amendment. It's an amendment to insert at the end of the bill, an appropriations bill, making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30th, 2005, and for other purposes.

"A new section..." This is the amendment. "A new section stating that none of the funds made available in the act may be used by any official of the U.S. government to request the United Nations to assess the validity of elections in the United States." So they have a specific amendment to this bill saying no money can be used and no U.S. official can use money or ask the UN to come in and monitor elections. They voted on this! The vote was close, folks. I mean, in a House sense it was close: 243 to 161! Two hundred and forty-three! The amendment was defeated; 161 Democrats voted to have the UN come in -- well, they didn't vote to do this, but they objected to the amendment that would prevent them from asking the UN to come in and assess elections. The ratio here and the most powerful way to express this is, Democrats, by five to one voted for the UN to be involved in the U.S. presidential election. Now, what is behind this? We discussed this a little last week. This is purely irrational. There's no way rational thinking people are going to want to turn over the election of a sovereign nation, the leader of the world, the United States, turn over this election to a body like the UN with its track record monitoring elections and screwing them up worldwide.

In fact, when the UN monitors elections, they call on Americans to go do it. Now, we can debate the Americans they call, people like Jimmy Carter and so forth, but nevertheless, the UN calls on Americans to go monitor elections. They don't do it. I mean, they've got some staff down there but I mean the authorities are always Americans, but that's beside the point. Why in the world would Democrats by a ratio of five-to-one -- well, aside from the fact that that's who they think their base is and they want to be on record as -- this is just to cement this notion that the election of 2000, particularly in Florida, was fraudulent, and they know that their base has become this kook fringe, kook fringe actually has become the mainstream, actually believes that this whole election was stolen, that millions were denied the right to vote, that millions others' votes weren't counted. The only explanation for believing such absolute folly is an irrational fear. There is a fear and a powerlessness that these people have been overcome with that is -- it's the only explanation for this kind of thinking.

This is unprecedented, and it's an indication of just how scared these people are. For all that, you may watch the mainstream media, and you may see countless reports about how confident Kerry and Edwards are, and how confident the Democrats are, and can't wait for the election, why, it's in the bag and so forth. They're not. It's the exact opposite. They are in near panic. They are in panic because they know they've lost all these state governorships. They've lost the House and they haven't got it back. They've lost the Senate. They are not gonna get either of those two back; the White House is their only hope. They know they've got a candidate on the top of the ticket that cannot excite anybody. They've got a candidate who when he's there, nobody notices him. Greatness does not have to be explained, and yet this party is still trying to explain John Kerry, and they're trying to explain John Kerry by putting pictures of John Edwards out there.

Don't believe these people are not in panic. I want to go through something else. Five-to-one, Democrats by a five-to-one ration voted essentially for the UN to be involved in monitoring the US presidential election, it was last Thursday. The debate, by the way, was the night of Corrine Brown's kook temper tantrum her remarks we played them for you on Friday. They were stricken from the Congressional Record. she called the Florida election a coup d'état, or "Coup d'état!" as she shouted it out from the House floor. Just unbelievable. But it's a classic illustration of the panic these people are feeling...

(snip)

Yeah, let's hear the Corrine Brown bit. We've got the Corrine Brown, if you missed it from last week. This is what was stricken from the record. This whole vote was last Thursday, and the debate took place the night of Corrine Brown's kook temper tantrum and this is what she said that was stricken from the record.

BROWN: Over 1,700 people that's technologists, lawyers, political scientists says that the technology that we're using in the upcoming election is flawed. I come from Florida, where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'état. We need to make sure that it doesn't happen again. Over and over again, after the election when you stole the election, you came back here and said, "Get over it." No, we're not going to get over it, and we want verification from the world.

RUSH: "The gentlelady from Florida." That will be stricken from the record. The gentlelady from Florida, Corrine Brown. That's what she said. They had to strike her comments because it was over the top.


The full transcript can be found here.

Vitter leads candidates in cash

Shreveport Times article here.

WASHINGTON -- In the race to replace retiring Democratic Sen. John Breaux, the top three fund-raisers reported having about $6.7 million in cash June 30, according to federal campaign finance reports.

Republican Rep. David Vitter has a significant lead in cash remaining with $3.4 million followed by Democratic Rep. Chris John with $2.5 million and state Treasurer John Kennedy with about $1 million.

(snip)

Vitter reported raising almost $1.3 million since April 30 with about $1.1 million from individual contributions and $184,000 from special interest groups.

Vitter said he was pleased with the contributions. He raised more money from individuals than either John or Kennedy in the last three months.

"The vast majority of the money raised for my campaign has come from individuals here in Louisiana," Vitter said. "This shows that my message of putting Louisiana first is resonating across the state."

Battle for the Coast

A well written article from The Advocate focuses on Vitter and John's battle over coastal restoration. The article can be found on its webpage here.

NEW ORLEANS -- The disintegration of the Louisiana coast is now so bad that it makes for good politicking.

In the past two weeks, the contest between the two congressmen running for the vacate U.S. Senate seat has pirouetted around the dynamics and needs of the dying coast.

U.S. Reps. David Vitter, R-Metairie, and Chris John, D-Crowley, are trying to don the mantle of the coast's crusader, now worn by the man they hope to replace: retiring Democratic Sen. John Breaux.

It started July 6, the first day back from the Fourth of July weekend.

That morning, Vitter and the White House issued news releases to announce "federal commitment" to the much-anticipated release of a 10-year plan that would bring up to $1.9 billion in projects for Louisiana.

The announcement turned out to be a partisan affair: The conference call with journalists featured Vitter and President Bush's environmental adviser.

Left out were Democrats, such as Gov. Kathleen Blanco's staff, who worked hard on the plan and pushed the administration to back it.

John lashed out, calling the announcement an election year ploy by Vitter "to try to take center stage on an issue that he hasn't been focused on."

Then each began issuing a series of news releases touting his accomplishments and commitment to saving the coast.

The back-and-forth continued with Vitter coming to New Orleans last Friday to take the media on an airplane trip over Lake Maurepas and talk about one of the river diversions called for in the new plan.

In the meantime, John kept calling Vitter's interest in the coast insincere.

Plainly, battling coastal erosion has become part of the rhetoric this election _ at least between these two rivals. The third contender, state treasurer John Kennedy, has not joined the recent fuss over coastal restoration.

"It's really nice to see Senate candidates trying to claim credit for doing something about the coast," said Windell Curole, a longtime advocate for the coast. "The only sad part is that we're 20 years late."

Curole said this election marks the first time that a statewide race has focused a lot of attention on the coast.

Political analysts said it shows how critical the state's land loss crisis has become.

"It hasn't become a big issue until the last few years because it is becoming worse every day," said Ed Renwick, a Loyola University political scientist. "This is an issue that has legs in south Louisiana and it will continue to be an issue."

"Coastal restoration has become a huge issue in south Louisiana and I think the candidates want to make sure they are on the correct side and they are all saying the same thing," said Wayne Parent, an LSU political scientist.

But Parent sees another motivation behind Vitter's interest in playing coastal crusader: He does not want to repeat the mistake of Suzanne Haik Terrell in the 2002 Senate race.

Back then, Landrieu won votes by accusing the Bush administration of trying to strike a secret deal with the Mexican government to import millions of tons of sugar _ a move she said would hurt Louisiana sugar cane farmers. The deal never came to fruition.

"I think they're running the last campaign," Parent said. "David Vitter doesn't want to get burned again by a local issue."

Likewise, Parent said, Democratic strategists want voters to perceive the president _ and by extension Vitter _ as just as uncaring about the coast as he was about sugar imports.

What is perplexing is how the coastal dilemma _ long viewed as a nonpartisan issue on which most everyone agreed _ can make for good politicking.

"I'm amazed that the candidates are talking about it so much, especially since they agree on it," Parent said. "Coastal people need to thank Gov. Foster for that. He made coastal erosion a huge issue at the end of his second term. He talked about it as much as education."

As for who can claim to be the coast's crusader, the verdict's still out. Neither Vitter nor John can claim major legislation dealing with the coast.

Vitter points to the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Act of 2000 as evidence of his commitment to the coast.

He championed the legislation, which injected about $18 million to improve waste water facilities and clean out waste lagoons at dairy farms in parishes through his Congressional district.

But while cleaner water does help the Lake Pontchartrain basin, it doesn't do much to stop land loss, especially in the southern reaches of the coast where the worst erosion is taking place.

But Vitter insists: "I've been working on these sorts of issues at least since I came to Congress."

For his part, John says he has been "fighting to protect Louisiana's coastline for 15 years."

John makes the claim by pointing to his support back in 1989 in the state Legislature for setting up a special agency to oversee wetlands preservation and creating a fund for wetlands restoration.

Both Vitter and John have supported key bills for Louisiana's coast, as has most of the Louisiana delegation.

So far, though, neither has led the fight for the coast, Curole said.

"I just know both of them have had an interest in it. Now, whether it's an election-year ploy, that's always hard to tell," said Curole, general manager of the South Lafourche Levee District. "Every politician tries to react to the needs and wants of the voting public and you never know the sincerity of them until after the election."

Sunday, July 18, 2004

Chris John casts surprising vote in favor of UN



Recently a group of congressmen sent a letter to the United Nations expressing their wish that the UN monitor America's presidential election this year to avoid the fiasco of the Florida recount. This effort was headed by Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-TX, who said the UN needs to "ensure free and fair elections in America." Why anyone would put the UN on a higher moral plane than our country is beyond me, but let's move on.

This led to an amendment to a spending bill being offered on the House floor this past Thursday, which would have denied American funding for any such UN observance. The vote was 243-161. All Republicans present voted for the amendment as well as 33 Democrats. The rest voted against the amendment.

All members of Louisiana's congressional delegation voting that day (Rep. Bill Jefferson of New Orleans was absent) all cast their votes in favor of the amendment. All but one: Rep. Chris John.

In a surprising move, Chris John voted to reject the amendment. Many of his fellow moderates, including Brad Carson (OK), Jim Turner (TX), and Gene Taylor (MS), voted with the Republicans, but John cast his lot with the liberal bloc in the House. The possiblity that the UN would really monitor our election is a longshot, but why would John not slam the door shut on such a ridiculous occurance? The very idea that we need the United Nations to watch our elections, as if we were some third world nation that has only begun to have democratic elections, is an insult to this nation, the freest and most democratic in the entire world.

Vitter released a statement on this matter, in which he said, "The United Nations has no business in our elections. If Chris John is so concerned about corruption and ‘stolen’ elections, he should follow my lead and release a detailed plan on what he would do to fight Louisianan’s corruption and cronyism. We do not need international help to stop corruption, we need strong Louisiana Leadership."

So far, there has been no word from Chris John. I would certainly like to know his reasoning behind his vote, as many Louisianans would.

I first learned about this vote on WWL 870 AM's afternoon show, "The David Tyree Show." Congressman Vitter called in at the top of the second hour to explain the vote and to express his disappointment that John voted against the amendment. As the show progressed, one caller, a conservative Democrat, objected to John's vote. He noted how the national Democrats have pulled John along, saying that John "is no conservative Democrat."

This is another example of how Chris John, along with his record of voting for tax increases, opposing tax cuts and true fiscal restraint at the federal level, is sliding out of touch with Louisiana voters. I hardly expected him to side with the Michael Moore wing of the Democratic Party, but this time he has.

Read the full roll call vote of H. R. 4818, and the vote on the Buyer amendment, here.

Read Vitter's full statement here.

Sunday stories from The Times Picayune

So what are our senate candidates up to? Read below:

Spider-Man 2 is more bipartisan

It's not often that a motion picture becomes an issue in a political race. But Rep. David Vitter's Senate campaign issued a release last week saying that the GOP congressman decided to see Michael Moore's controversial film "Fahrenheit 9/11" after Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., had praised it. But after seeing the flick last week, he said he came away "appalled by the movie" and Landrieu's supportive statement of it. "Michael Moore's movie is pure Hollywood propaganda," Vitter said of the movie, which takes a harsh look at the Bush administration. "We must reject these sorts of hate-filled lies, particularly when we are at war. Mary Landrieu should have said that instead of joining the Hollywood elite in supporting the movie. I urge John Kennedy, Chris John and Arthur Morrell (his Democratic opponents in the Senate race) to join me in standing up for Louisiana values and rejecting this hate-filled propaganda." There was no immediate comment from Landrieu or the three Democratic candidates.

Morrell visits D.C. for party talk

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the fund-raising arm of the national party, has already thrown its support to Rep. Chris John in Louisiana's U.S. Senate race. In fact, committee Chairman Sen. Jon Corzine has urged all other Democrats to get out of the contest. That didn't deter state Rep. Arthur Morrell, D-New Orleans, from making the trip to Washington last week to pay a call. Morrell, one of three announced Democrats in the race, met with Corzine, D-N.J., on Thursday. There was no word on what was discussed.

GOP looks to even the score in Louisiana against Dems

Full article here.

What's this? Republicans trying to learn from Democrats!

Republican Parish Executive Committee member Sean Riecke said that's exactly the case.

Riecke told a Baton Rouge League of Women Voters meeting last week that there's been "one clear weakness" in state Republican Party efforts to win recent Louisiana U.S. Senate and governor's races: "Lack of organization throughout the state."

"Democrats have done a very good job of getting people to the polls," Riecke said.

With the re-election of President Bush and Republican U.S. Rep. David Vitter's election to the U.S. Senate on the line, Riecke said the state GOP is preparing to match the Democratic effort.

"We are building our own grass-roots organization around the state and in each parish," Riecke said. And even down to the precinct and block level, he said.

Thursday, July 15, 2004

More Vitter statements: gay marriage, homeland security


Here are two statements straight from the Vitter website concerning Senator Breaux and Landrieu's vote to keep the marriage amendment from coming to a vote, and on Chris John's remarks on Vitter's record on homeland security. Both statements can be found here and here.

Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage

“This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history, and our two U.S. Senators won’t do anything about it.

We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values. I am the only Senate Candidate to coauthor the Federal Marriage Amendment; the only one fighting for its passage. I am the only candidate proposing changes to the senate rules to stop liberal obstructionists from preventing an up or down vote on issues like this, judges, energy, and on and on.” stated David Vitter.

Vitter Comments on John’s Homeland Security Record

“Chris John’s negative and partisan attacks, claiming that Rudy Giuliani, President Bush, and I do not support securing our homeland, are sad and desperate, particularly considering he recently missed nine votes to fund America’s Homeland Security. Yet, all Chris John seems to be able to do is propose that we quadruple spending after historic increases.”

“I have offered real leadership in contrast. I introduced port security legislation and got key provisions of my legislation passed into law two years ago; Chris John introduced his bill last week. I’ve led the fight to bring a Homeland Security Regional Headquarters to Louisiana; Chris John has been AWOL in that effort. I’ve fought for tough immigration enforcement; Chris John voted against it. I passed an amendment to require all bags to be screened before they are placed on the airplane; Chris John skipped the vote to fund America’s Homeland Security,” said David Vitter.

Vitter blasts Louisiana Senators who voted against marriage amendment

Congressman David Vitter voiced his frustrations with Senators Breaux and Landrieu's recent vote to keep the constitutional amendment from coming to a full Senate vote.

Excerpted from The Times Picayune

Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, who is running for the Senate seat being vacated by Breaux, touched off the battle when his campaign issued a statement saying he was outraged by the votes of Louisiana's senators.

"The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history and our two U.S. senators won't do anything about it," Vitter said.

Breaux responded with an angry statement through his spokesman. "Politicians should be more worried about their own marriages than about criticizing how other politicians vote on marriage," Breaux said.

Breaux appeared to be alluding to Vitter's decision last year not to run for governor. Vitter said then that he wanted to spend more time with his family and revealed that he and his wife, Wendy, were seeing a marriage counselor.

Asked for a response to Breaux's comment, spokesman Mac Abrams said, "Congressman Vitter is happy to debate what the best public policy is for Louisiana families, but he is not going to engage in personal snipes."


So Senator Breaux is going to take a page out of the radical left's playbook and attack the character of the man rather than the policy? Breaux may as well admit it: he's been nailed. Besides, I thought people's private lives were none of our business. Didn't Bill Clinton teach us that, senator?

I have another article from The Shreveport Times linked, in which Vitter adds, "We need a U.S. senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts' values." Truer words were never spoken.

Full articles here(Picayune) and here(Shreveport Times).

Tuesday, July 13, 2004

More Giuliani Coverage



WWL.com gives us some more coverage of Giuliani's visit to Louisiana. Here are the snippets from the WWL.com website:

Source=WWL.com

GIULIANI: STAY ON THE OFFENSIVE IN WAR ON TERROR

Former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani came to Louisiana Tuesday to help fellow Republican David Vitter in his campaign for Senate.

Giuliani told WWL's David Tyree that the best way to fight the war on terror is to define the terms of battle: "We have to be on offense against world terrism, and not go back to where we were before, on defense. Terrorists act secretly, they act quietly, they attack you by surprise, and then all of the sudden, you find two or three thousand people that are dead and gone."

Giuliani says we need leadership that won't waver when other poiticians and pundits change their minds if things get tough. He says President Bush has made America safer by going on offense against threats of terror.


GIULIANI'S REPUTATION MAY BOOST VITTER CAMPAIGN

LSU political science professor Wayne Parent says even though past efforts to woo Louisiana voters with national GOP figures has failed, he says this time it could be a good move, because of the respect Giuliani earned in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.

“I think we are going to see a lot of important Republicans down here, and Giuliani is a star in the Republican Party,” says Parent.

On the Democratic side, State Treasurer John Kennedy started a statewide campaign swing Tuesday. State Representative Art Morell and Congressman Chris John are the other Democrats in the race.

Giuliani makes stop in Lafayette

Story from The Lafayette Daily Advertiser.

LAFAYETTE — Two months ago, Congressman David Vitter wanted to sit down and discuss his goals if elected to the U.S. Senate seat with former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Forty-five minutes later, Giuliani agreed to visit Louisiana on Vitter’s behalf. Today, Giuliani, who was given the title “America’s mayor,” for leadership after the 9-11 attacks, will make two campaign stops in support of Vitter — in Kenner and then in Lafayette for a “Red, White and Rudy” rally at 3 p.m. in a hangar at the Lafayette Regional Airport.

Vitter’s goals to clean up the state’s tarnished image to help develop more jobs was something the men had in common, the congressman said.

“He really helped lead New York through a tremendous renaissance and it began with fighting crime and corruption,” Vitter said. “That’s a lot of what my campaign was about.”

Fighting cronyism and corruption in the state is one of the goals listed in Vitter’s agenda — “Fighting for our Future — David Vitter’s Bold Louisiana Agenda.” In the document, Vitter vows to target “good ‘ol boy” practices.

“That’s a major challenge we need to face,” Vitter said.

About 1,500 tickets were handed out for the event, but spots are still available, said Mark Gremillion, parish coordinator for the Lafayette Parish Republican party. He encouraged those without tickets to arrive at 2 p.m.

Presidential coattails could spell trouble for Democratic Senate hopefuls

I got this piece from the front page of the NRSC webpage. Some very interesting bits that pertain to our own senate race. I've highlighted the names that pertain to the Louisiana Democratic candidates.

Excerpted from Roll Call; July 12, 2004

Every election cycle, candidates for the U.S. House and Senate must decide whether to try to ride a partisan wave to victory or win by emphasizing local issues and race-specific contrasts. This year, the choice is not as easy as you may think for Congressional candidates...

...Democratic Senate prospects rest on the party’s ability to win races in conservative and Republican states in the South and West. There is no dispute about that.

That means the party’s candidates in those regions — including South Carolina Senate hopeful Inez Tenenbaum, Alaska hopeful Tony Knowles, Oklahoma nominee Brad Carson, Colorado Senate hopeful Ken Salazar and Louisiana candidates Chris John and John Kennedy — will have to run far ahead of the Kerry-Edwards ticket to win.

So Tenenbaum & Co. are running as moderates or even conservatives, emphasizing their differences with Kerry. Carson, Knowles and John have already held a press event stating their support for some drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which puts them at odds with Kerry, Edwards and the party’s liberals.

But despite these efforts, presidential nominee Kerry could still end up being a huge problem for these Senate candidates...

...Carson, Knowles and John surely know that drilling in ANWR won’t have a chance in a Democratic-controlled Senate, and many voters — many pro-drilling Republican voters in their states — will likely come to the same conclusion as November approaches...


Couldn't have said it better myself.

Monday, July 12, 2004

Dems unlikely to regain Senate, says Donald Lambro (Louisiana likely GOP pickup!)

Here's a great piece from the Washington Times. Lately, Democrats have been claiming the chances are good for them to regain the Senate. Not so, says Lambro.

A recent wave of stories about the 2004 Senate races has suggested the Democrats are on the brink of recapturing majority control of the narrowly divided chamber.
Don't believe it.

Independent election analysts who closely track these contests tell me these heavily slanted stories are overplaying the Democrats' chances in the strongly Republican South and West. They see the GOP's 51-48 majority (with one independent) not changing or growing by one or two seats.

A typical report in this month's ultraliberal the Nation magazine — titled "Will the Senate tip?" — all but forecasts a Democratic takeover in the making. "If the Democrats re-elect their incumbents, hold three of the five [open Democratic] Southern seats and win the four GOP-held seats outside the South, where they are currently running strong, they're at 51," the magazine indicated.

Time Magazine breathlessly reported that "suddenly the math has changed: Democrats can see their way to a net gain of two seats, which would give them a slim advantage in the Senate."

But that's not how Senate elections tracker Jennifer Duffy of the Cook Political Report sees these races shaping up. Asked if these media reports are exaggerated, she replies, "Absolutely. These Southern Senate races are far from a done deal."

Nathan Gonzales, editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, which also closely follows Senate races, goes even further:

"There's no question that the Senate is competitive and is in play and over the past few months Democratic opportunities have gotten better," he told me.

"That being said, the landscape is still difficult for the Democrats, who have to win in Republican-leaning states. Our outlook is either no change in the Senate's mathematical makeup or Republicans plus one," he said.

(snip)

There's little doubt the Republicans will lose a seat in Illinois, and the GOP's open seats in Oklahoma and Colorado look competitive right now, though these are both GOP-leaning states. But the biggest battle for the Senate will be won or lost in the conservative, Republican-trending South, where five Democratic retirements have given the GOP a lot of chances for net gains. Among them:

• Georgia: "It's gone for the Democrats," Mr. Duffy told me. The front-runner is Republican Rep. Johnny Isakson, the likely winner of the July 20 primary. Democrats have been unable to recruit a strong opponent. A solid pickup for the GOP.

• Louisiana: Republican Rep. David Vitter leads in the polls and has $3.4 million cash on hand. The Democrats are split in a bitter intraparty fight. This state has never elected a Republican senator, but the betting here is they will this year.

• North Carolina: Former Clinton chief of staff Erskine Bowles makes another bid for the Senate after losing to Elizabeth Dole in 2002 with only 45 percent of the vote. Polls show him leading Republican Rep. Richard Burr, 47 to 39 percent. But Republican strategists say Mr. Bowles' numbers are the result of months of costly TV ads, while Mr. Burr has not run one TV ad and is still at nearly 40 percent. A tossup.

• South Carolina: Republican polling shows Democrat Inez Tenenbaum, state education superintendent, trails Republican Rep. Jim DeMint by 7 points, 43 percent to 50 percent. Miss Tenenbaum is running as a centrist and backs President Bush on Iraq, a constitutional amendment on same-sex "marriage," the death penalty and the antiterrorism U.S.A. Patriot Act.

But this is a Republican state Mr. Bush carried by 16 points in 2000. Mr. DeMint, whose general election campaign is just starting, has a united party behind him and a well-financed war chest. Mr. Rothenberg rated this one "lean to takeover."

• Florida: Former state Education Commissioner Betty Castor is the Democratic front-runner, but that could change. She is under fierce attack in her party primary from Rep. Peter Deutsch for not firing an alleged terrorist, Sami Al-Arian, when she headed the University of South Florida in the 1990s. Mr. Al-Arian was fired last year after being indicted on charges he was the North American head of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Former Rep. Bill McCollum, who lost his 2000 Senate bid, is leading a large Republican field including former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Mel Martinez. But Mr. McCollum's polls have not budged in months, while the White House-backed Mr. Martinez's numbers have risen in recent weeks.

We won't know how this race will go until the candidates are selected in the Aug. 31 primary. But this is a strongly Republican state, and White House political strategist Karl Rove is betting a Martinez candidacy will be swept to victory by the state's large Hispanic community.

Full story here.

Vitter responds to remarks by Chris John

Lately, Rep. Chris John has been taking shots at Vitter for his announced support of federal aid for 1-49, claiming Vitter has not been serious about seeking aid in the past. Here is what Vitter had to say:

Vitter responds to statements by John
July 11, 2004

Yesterday, I read Ms. Corbell’s article about I-49 that cites a Mr. John press release that was critical of my work on the issue.

First, I am a strong supporter of I-49 South. Understanding the importance of this interstate to Louisiana, I testified before Congress to ensure that they were fully aware of I-49’s needs. I requested and received a $7 million earmark specifically for I-49. This funding will be in addition to what will be awarded to the interstate through two new federally managed accounts.

Contrary to Mr. John’s statement, on April 2, 2004, I voted for passage of the highway bill. It is clearly stated in the Congressional Record (Roll Call Vote 114) that not only did I vote for the bill, but the House Transportation Chairman praised my efforts for I-49 on the House Floor.

Thirdly, it is correct that I “didn’t sign a March 2004 letter. ...” I reviewed the letter and came to the conclusion that this request short changed I-49 South. It stated only $30 million of the $700 million requested would be for I-49 South, and this decreased the amount originally requested. I believe we should continue to fight for the highest possible level of funding and I conveyed this point to the House Transportation Chairman.

Working for I-49 should be apolitical. Regardless of political party, everyone understands the importance of I-49 to the state’s economy. Making partisan and inaccurate statements about who has and has not done what, will not get I-49 built any sooner.

David Vitter
Member of Congress



Article found here.

Gay Marriage ban comes up for vote

As the vote on a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage revs up, here's a look at where many of Louisiana's elected officials stand.

WASHINGTON -- In an atmosphere superheated by a presidential campaign and partisan politics, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote this week on a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.

Republicans say there is no time to lose in setting up a constitutional barrier to gay marriage. But Democrats say the amendment is unneeded and that the timing of the debate is clearly suspect, coming just two weeks before the start of the Democratic National Convention in Boston on July 26.

Both sides agree the measure is unlikely to get the two-thirds support needed for passage, and Democrats say Republicans are merely trying to force Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and John Edwards, D-N.C., the Democrats' presumptive presidential ticket, to cast votes on an issue that divides the nation and the party. Kerry and Edwards oppose the proposed amendment, saying that although they do not support same-sex marriage, the issue should be left to individual states to decide.

"This debate is not about preserving the sanctity of marriage," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. "It's about preserving our Republican White House and Senate."

In at least two important respects, the issue is a political winner for Republicans. Surveys show that a majority of Americans oppose gay marriage, with opposition especially strong among African-Americans, a core constituency of the Democratic Party. The issue also serves to energize Christian conservatives, who tend to vote Republican.

Social conservative activists were on Capitol Hill last week pressuring selected senators to vote for a constitutional amendment. On Friday, they delivered petitions with more than 1 million signatures of people opposed to same-sex marriage. They also have worked hard to fire up their grass-roots supporters, urging them to deluge the offices of wavering senators.

In Louisiana, Democratic Sens. John Breaux and Mary Landrieu both say they oppose gay marriage, but they have signaled opposition to a constitutional change. Landrieu said it is "an insult" to amend the Constitution to take away rights.

"It is moving us in directions contrary to all (previous) directions of the Constitution, which has expanded liberties, not contracted them," she said.

Breaux and Landrieu, like many Democrats, have argued that the issue is a matter best left to the states. But proponents of the amendment say it takes into account existing state laws.

(snip)

Despite the buildup, few expect the federal proposal to muster the 67 votes it needs in the Senate. To be enshrined in the Constitution it must also pass the House and then be ratified by 38 states.

House Republican leaders have vowed to keep up the drumbeat with a vote of their own on the eve of the Democratic convention.

Proponents say that when the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court struck down that state's law banning same-sex marriage, it was a sign a constitutional solution was necessary. They say gay couples married in Massachusetts would have to be recognized as legally wed elsewhere and that courts in other states might also determine that equal rights clauses in state constitutions require recognition of same-sex unions.

"The public policy interest in preventing this development seems obvious to everyone but a few judges and state officials insulated from public opinion," Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said during one of four hearings he has held on the issue. "Those who want to impose this radical change, which has yet to be embraced by any society, have the burden of showing that this experiment will not weaken traditional marriage."
Polls suggest many Americans are sympathetic to that view. Most alarming for Democrats are surveys such as the one conducted May 20 to 23 for CBS News that found that 57 percent of Democrats favored amending the Constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage. The nationwide poll of 1,113 adults found that 78 percent of Republicans held that view.

Among Louisiana lawmakers in the House, a constitutional amendment is supported by Reps. David Vitter, R-Metairie, Billy Tauzin, R-Chackbay, Richard Baker, R-Baton Rouge, Chris John, D-Crowley, and Rodney Alexander, D-Quitman. State Treasurer John Kennedy, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, also supports a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Another candidate, state Rep. Arthur Morrell, D-New Orleans, doesn't.


Contrary to what Senator Landrieu has said here, a constitutional amendment is perfectly legimate and hardly a robbery of liberties, as opposed to the oppression of liberal courts who believe they can make the law up out of thin air.

Full article here.

Sunday, July 11, 2004

Senate hopefuls lay out positions

Here's a story from The Times Picayune on the candidates for the Senate.

By and large, Louisiana farmers have considered U.S. Sen. John Breaux, D-La., a friend, someone who will be missed when he retires after November's election.

So it was with special interest that about 300 farmers and their families listened Saturday to the four candidates vying for Breaux's seat as they spoke at the annual Louisiana Farm Bureau Federation convention at the Marriott Hotel on Canal Street.

Some in the audience already had made up their minds about who will get their vote. But some were undecided, and the candidates -- U.S. Rep. Chris John, D-Crowley; Democratic state Treasurer John Kennedy of Zachary; state Rep. Arthur Morrell, D-New Orleans; or U.S. Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie -- were banking on that as they shared not just their political views, but also their personal stories.

Most of them agreed on the key issues. They talked about protecting Louisiana farmers from low-priced imports. They talked about opposing the Central American Free Trade Agreement because of how it could hurt the state's sugar farmers. And they argued that they would fight for Louisiana's interests when drafting the next federal farm bill, legislation that's sure to come up in the winner's six-year term.

But they drew contrasts in other areas.

(snip)

Vitter, the lone Republican in the race, touted his experience. Since replacing Bob Livingston in Congress, Vitter said, he has been in touch with Louisiana's values, stood up against special interests, sometimes including President Bush, and been effective.

When it comes to representing Louisiana, Vitter said, "I humbly submit (that) of all the candidates, I have the proven and concrete record to do just that."


Rest of article here.

Sunday Headlines from The Times Picayune

Here are some stories from The Times Picayune (full story here.) This Sunday brings a fresh crop of goings on from Louisiana's politicians.

Crossing the party line

Louisiana's Democrats in Congress continue to be among the least loyal when it comes to voting with their national party, according to a survey of votes compiled by Congressional Quarterly. Through June, Sen. John Breaux had voted against the Democratic position 34 percent of the time, while Sen. Mary Landrieu opposed 26 percent of her party's initiatives. They were in the top five Democratic defectors in the Senate. But no one came close to Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga., who went against his party on 98 percent of the votes, making him more loyal to the GOP than many Senate Republicans. In the House, Chris John, D-Crowley, and Rodney Alexander, D-Quitman, were among the top 10 Democratic defectors. John voted against the party 33 percent of the time and Alexander 31 percent. Overall, however, party identification -- and political partisanship -- was still high. Senate Democrats supported their party 83 percent of the time, and Republicans stuck together on 91 percent of votes.

However, all but Rodney Alexander in this list are firmly backing the liberal ticket of John Kerry-John Edwards. Chris John, Breaux and Landrieu have also stiffed support for the president's tax cuts at a time when the economy needs them to continue the current recovery. Also, Chris John refuses to vote for restraints in federal spending unless tax increases are involved. I give kudos to them for defecting from their liberal collegues on issues such as energy, but could we do better? I think we can.

Also, let's give kudos to Senator Zell Miller, who truly understands the south and its values, even more than Breaux and Landrieu. He recognizes that a Kerry presidency could be disaterous for the war on terror and is backing Bush. Why our own Democrats don't see the appeasement policies of Kerry as dangerous is simply baffling.

Vitter seeks central location

Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, and his family are moving, but not for long. Vitter said the family is renting a house in Alexandria during the August recess to help him with his campaign for Senate. There are two reasons, Vitter said. That part of the state, he said, has not voted as consistently Republican as one "might expect, based on the population," he said. "So we want to see if we can get our vote out," Vitter said. But also factoring in his decision, Vitter said, is that Alexandria is "centrally located," making it easier to get to campaign events across the state.

A smart move, as Vitter will need votes from outside the "boot" section of Louisiana. He has a solid base in the New Orleans suburbs, but his task will be to rack up more support particularly in the rural areas that decide Louisiana's elections.

Landrieu leads Kerry crusade

John Kerry's presidential campaign tapped Louisiana Sens. Mary Landrieu and John Breaux as part of a group of nine Democrats chosen to deliver the message last week of how pleased party members were with the Massachusetts senator's selection of John Edwards as his running mate. It was an effort to maintain control over the message, something the Kerry campaign said Republicans often are better at than Democrats. Landrieu ended up making three appearances in a little more than an hour on cable networks MSNBC, CNN and Fox, telling each network's viewers that Edwards would build support for Kerry, particularly in the South and Midwest. Landrieu is to appear today opposite Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to talk about the campaign on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos."


Hopefully the south will not be fooled into thinking the most liberal ticket since Mondale-Ferraro represents their values. We'll be seeing a lot of this in the months ahead.

Cleaning up Lake Pontchartrain

Rep. David Vitter, R-Metairie, got a hearing last week before the House Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee on his proposal to reauthorize the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program. The program, which Vitter help passed as a freshman, has generated nearly $18 million for projects to clean up and restore the lake. "The federal resources made available through the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Restoration Program are helping advance these efforts so that one day the lake will be fully restored," Vitter said.

Kennedy feels cold shoulder

State Treasurer John Kennedy is crying foul at the obvious preference that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is showing to Rep. Chris John in Louisiana's U.S. Senate race. Committee leaders have made no secret that the organization considers John the party's best shot at winning the seat being vacated by John Breaux, and last week the organization scheduled a news conference for John and two other Democratic candidates to highlight their support for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. It's a position that Kennedy shares, but he wasn't invited to the news conference. "Two years ago Washington Republican leaders thought they could name the next Louisiana senator and they failed, and now two years later Washington Democratic leaders are doing the same and they'll fail, too," Kennedy said.

Kennedy is defintely onto something here. In 2002, the national Republicans picked Suzanne Haik Terrell to take on Senator Landrieu after Rep. John Cooksey made his infamous "diaper head" comment. This intrevention angered a lot of locals who did not like their candidates being picked for them. In many polls, Chris John is trailing Kennedy for the number two spot in the runoff behind Vitter. If this becomes an issue among local Democrats, Chris John may well not get the chance to compete against Vitter later this year.

Class-action contretemps

Sens. Mary Landrieu and John Breaux, both D-La., are getting heat for casting votes against ending a filibuster of legislation to curtail class-action lawsuits. Landrieu said she and two other Democrats agreed on a compromise in December but thought Senate Republicans were unreasonably barring consideration of amendments, including some that "would have made notable improvements to this bill." Landrieu said it seems to her that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., wanted a campaign issue rather than passage of a bill long sought by businesses in Louisiana and elsewhere. "We waited for half a year before he moved this bill, and we didn't get two hours into debate before he moved to end it," Landrieu said. Frist said Democrats were making unreasonable demands for votes on a host of amendments. Breaux said he favors limits but voted against the motion to bring the bill to the floor. "If the Republican leadership had allowed reasonable and open debate on amendments," Breaux said, "we could have improved this legislation and passed it easily out of the Senate."

No doubt their former trial lawyer turned vice presidential candidate, John Edwards, is cheering from the sidelines, "Way to go Breaux and Landrieu!"

Friday, July 09, 2004

Funny Cartoon

Two days ago I posted quite a bit about John Edwards' "Two Americas" speech. Well, here's a great cartoon that captures Mr. Edwards' vision...though probably not in the way he thought of it...

Wednesday, July 07, 2004

America's Mayor Comes to Louisiana, Stumps For Vitter!



Straight from the campaign website:

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani will be in Louisiana on Tuesday, July 13, to headline two rallies in support of U.S. Rep. David Vitter’s bid for the U.S. Senate.

“I am excited to have Mayor Giuliani’s active support,” Vitter said. “Rudy’s record is one of dedicated public service and a tireless commitment to fighting corruption, and I’m honored to host him during his visit to Louisiana.”

Mayor Giuliani will be the featured speaker at David Vitter for U.S. Senate rallies celebrating “Red, White, and Rudy.” In Kenner, the 1:00 p.m. event will take place at the Pontchartrain Center on Williams Blvd at the lake. In Lafayette, the 3:00 p.m. rally will take place at the Paul Fournet Air Service Hanger #2 at the Lafayette Regional Airport. Both events are free and open to the public.

As a U.S. Attorney in the 1980s, Giuliani battled organized crime and spearheaded efforts to jail drug dealers and fight corruption at all levels of government. His success continued as Mayor of New York City, from 1994 to 2001, where Giuliani faced municipal challenges with optimism and determination.

In 2001, Giuliani was named “Person of the Year” by Time Magazine for his steadfast courage in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks.

“These exciting events will help sustain the momentum we’ve established all across the state,” Vitter said. “Mayor Giuliani’s leadership will help highlight my own bold Louisiana agenda, particularly in the area of turning Louisiana around just as he turned New York City around, including through fighting corruption and cronyism. And the rallies will be a terrific opportunity for Louisiana families to come together and showcase our state pride.”

Rep. John proposes and supports prescription drug bill, but past record shows otherwise

Congressman and U.S. Senate hopeful Chris John, D-Crowley, on Tuesday took to the steps of LSU Health Sciences Center just hours before he planned to submit legislation in Washington, D.C., designed to lower the price of prescription drugs by reimporting medications from Canada.

"Prescription drug prices have risen at three times faster than inflation in the past four years. Americans have a right to be outraged that we pay twice as much as a Canadian for the exact same drug from the exact same manufacturer," John said.

John told a crowd that filled the steps at the entrance to the hospital that his proposal, the Drug Importation, Promotion and Safety Act of 2004, includes three provisions to ensure the safety and integrity of reimported prescription drugs.
(Rest of article here.)

Rep. John's unveiling did not go without comment. Here's the press release from the Vitter campaign (web page also here):

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Mac Abrams
(504) 833-1163

Vitter Welcomes Chris John's Change of Heart on Drug Reimportation

“I am very surprised at Chris’ proposal given his long voting record against reimportation, but I welcome him to the debate. I should be flattered that he is following the lead I’ve set with my bold, specific health care plan, which I introduced in May and the lead I set by actually voting against the drug companies and for reimportation when he did the opposite,” David Vitter stated.

Chris John's Health Care Record

7/25/2003 John voted NO on HR 2427, Roll no. 445, Pharmaceutical access Act of 2003

6/27/2003 John voted against the Medicare Prescription Drug and Modernization Act,
Roll Call 332

6/28/2002 John opposed the Medicare Modernization and Prescription Drug Act of 2002, Roll Call 282

7/11/2001 John voted against H Amt. 150 to HR 2330, Agriculture Appropriations Bill,
Roll Call No. 217

AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION:
Amendment allows individuals to import a prescription drug that appears to be FDA approved and manufactured pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and does not appear to be a narcotic.

For David Vitter's complete health care plan, which he released on May 26, please go to www.davidvitter.com.


In another article published today, Rep. John questions the timing of a recent announcement by Vitter on a deal to provide coastal restoration funding for Louisiana.

"I've been fighting for this for 15 years," John said of coastal restoration. "Mr. Vitter has decided he will make an announcement four months before the election. To see them hold a press conference with nobody else in on it, I think that raises some real questions about their commitment to coastal restoration." (Rest of article here.)

I wonder if that's the same commitment Mr. John has shown in his past votes against prescription drug legislation. Whatever you may think of the issue, Vitter is certainly being more consistent. And to suggest that the coastal restoration funding is a campaign ploy on Mr. Vitter's part is very interesting coming from someone who is only now, four months outside of the election, making a big deal about prescription drugs.

Taking on Edwards' "Two Americas" speech

Here's some more from that Times Picayune article:

Some Louisiana Democrats said Edwards is a highly articulate spokesman for a key Kerry campaign theme: the "two Americas" they contend are fostered by Bush policies that help the affluent but do little for the middle class or those hoping to work their way out of poverty.

I didn't agree with this "Two Americas" premise then, and I don't buy it now. Rest assured we'll be hearing this theme or variations on it in this presidential election year, and I want to reprint a February column I wrote concerning Senator Edwards' speech. I hope you find it gives a new angle on what Senator Edwards and his fellow Democrats are really saying. Here it is, the February 19th column of "The Bayou Brawl."

Are there really two Americas? That seems to be the prevailing message if you are a Democrat running for president. In his run for the Democratic nomination, Senator John Edwards frequently gives a speech in which he speaks of “Two Americas.” He defines it as this: “One America that does the work, another America that reaps the reward. One America that pays the taxes, another America that gets the tax breaks. One America that will do anything to leave its children a better life, another America that never has to do a thing because its children are already set for life.” The bulk of Edwards’ speech is devoted to how President Bush is dividing the country between the rich and the working class.

Edwards’ speech is just a fresh coat of paint on an old car. He tells the story of class struggle well, but it is nothing that has not been told before. Actually, I do see two Americas, but it’s not the two Americas of which Senator Edwards speaks.

I see liberal politicians rage against “tax cuts for the rich,” when they have stacked the tax code so that the top fifty percent of wage earners pay ninety-six percent of the taxes. Meanwhile, these same politicians have already made their fortunes. If they truly wanted to tax the rich, they would impose luxury taxes.

I see President Bush speak positively about our religious institutions and their capacity to do good for society’s poor and infirm. On the other hand, Howard Dean is telling Southerners to stop voting based on “God and guns.”

I see two newspaper ads in “The Times Picayune” from the group D.C. Parents for School Choice publicly begging Senator Mary Landrieu (D) to vote for a school voucher program in Washington D.C., a program the city’s mayor is openly endorsing. Overall, I see these liberal politicians talk about how they’re devoted to quality education for low income families, and then they drive off to send their kids to private schools.

I see the excesses of the private sector routinely impugned, while government bureaucracy runs wild with our tax money. Ordinary American families have to balance their checkbooks, but government just spends and spends and spends. Whenever someone suggests cutting waste, he is criticized for being cruel and heartless. In Washington D.C., if a program goes up five percent one year but only two percent the next year, that is considered a Draconian cut.

I see Senator Edwards, Howard Dean and John Kerry claim President Bush is dividing the country, but they do not consider their complicity by preaching a message that America is a destitute, unfair place. They plant seeds of envy in working class Americans against those who have more than they do. They also make the wealthy seem like they cheated or stole their wealth. How can people like Edwards preach about hard work when in the next sentence they castigate wealthy people, as if the wealthy never had to work for their money?

I do believe Senator Edwards is right. There are “Two Americas.” There is an America of big spenders, big regulators, tax increasers, and social dividers. Then there’s the America of everyone else, people going to work, paying their taxes, desiring to send their kids to schools that reflect their values, and just wanting to be left alone. Now, in which America does Senator Edwards live?

LA Dems hopeful on Edwards

Louisiana Democrats are excited over Kerry's choice of Senator Edwards to be his running mate. Will it help Democrats on the ballot this year? They seem to think so.

Democrats predicted Tuesday that John Kerry's selection of North Carolina Sen. John Edwards as his running mate will bring a level of comfort to those Louisiana voters unhappy with President Bush but wary of supporting a Massachusetts senator at the top of the ticket.

(snip)

Sen. John Breaux, D-La., who in private meetings with Kerry had suggested that Edwards would help him in the region, said the 51-year-old first-term North Carolina senator "can speak to Southern values."


He's the fourth most liberal senator in Washington, according to National Journal. What values would those be, senator? He's pro-abortion, pro gun control, pro tax increase, you name it.

And far from being a burden, Breaux said, Edwards' legal career of "working to protect and help the little guy" will be a big selling point, particularly in a poor state such as Louisiana.

Senator, with all due respect, you couldn't be more wrong. The mass litigation of frivolous lawsuits has actually cost the little guy more. It has driven up the cost of health care, particularly in neighboring Mississippi, where the medical insurance costs are so high that some doctors won't enter the field. This situation also led to the defeat of Mississippi's incumbent governor, Ronnie Musgrove, and the election of Republican Haley Barbour.

"I think he brings a level of excitement up and down the ticket, not just for the presidential race but all the way down to the congressional races, including the Senate," said Rep. Chris John, D-Crowley, who is running for the Senate seat being vacated by Breaux.

I wonder what it says if the person on top of the ticket can't provide coattails for his fellow party members in competitive races, but instead his running mate has to do it.

Here's what Senator Landrieu had to say:

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., said Edwards' selection might not have been so important if voters still had faith in the policies of the Bush administration. But she said confidence is evaporating because of problems in Iraq and continued challenges with the economy and education, giving Edwards a chance to help promote Kerry "as a viable alternative to four more years" of Bush.

Actually, the economy is on track for a robust boom, and the situation in Iraq is improving as well. I don't think Louisiana voters have reason to worry about the Bush administration, senator. I should also note that both Kerry and Edwards warned us about Saddam prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Did they misled the country as well?

Full story here.

Tuesday, July 06, 2004

Vitter, White House secure backing on federal aid to restore Louisiana's coast.

Bayoubuzz.com released this announcement today.

U.S. Rep. David Vitter today joined Jim Connaughton, President Bush’s chief environmental advisor, in announcing a Near-Term Plan to fight coastal erosion in Louisiana. The plan includes up to $1.9 billion in coastal restoration work, $1.2 billion of which is fast-tracked.

“This Near-Term Plan is a first step, but a very important one in the fight against coastal erosion. It’s a breakthrough in terms of federal commitment,” Vitter said.

“It accomplishes the five key near-term objectives I have been pushing:

1. Releasing the substance of the full Louisiana Coastal Area Study. That is released with this Near-Term Plan, which is important so that we all understand the further effort which will be needed.

2. Making sure the Near-Term Plan is significant in term of dollars. It is - $1.9 billion, with $1.2 billion of that “fast tracked.”

3. Starting concrete work soon. And at my insistence the schedule for the initial project was pushed up to 2006.

4. Including significant diversion projects. And we have done that with the inclusion of projects such as the Small Diversion at Hope Canal and Myrtle Grove Diversion in the fast tracked projects.

5. Making sure everyone understands this is a start and not the end. And everyone does understand that – including that White House, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Corp of Engineers. This important start will be a failure – wasted money – unless it leads to further effective projects as outlined in the submission model for the Louisiana Coastal Area Study, which are attached to this Near-Term Plan.”

This announcement follows months of meetings and lobbying by Vitter, including two meetings on the subject with President Bush and other detailed discussions with Connaughton, Office of Management and Budget Director Josh Bolton and the leadership of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Kerry Edwards ticket at odds with Louisiana Democratic Senators

Here's an informative piece, courtesy of bayoubuzz.com. Very revealing, and very much worth a look if you think the views of Louisiana's Democrats and Kerry-Edwards are compatible.


Edwards and Kerry at Odds with Louisiana Democrats


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Sens. Breaux And Landrieu On $87 Billion Supplemental Aid For Iraq & Afghanistan: Edwards And Kerry Voted Against, Breaux And Landrieu Voted For. (S. 1689, CQ Vote #400: Passed 87-12: R 50-0; D 37-11, I 0-1, 10/17/03, Edwards and Kerry Voted Nay, Breaux and Landrieu Voted Yea)


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Sens. Breaux And Landrieu On Medicare Prescription Drug Bill: Edwards And Kerry Voted Against, Breaux And Landrieu Voted For It. (H.R. 1, CQ Vote #459: Adopted 54-44: R 42-9; D 11-35, I 1-0, 11/25/03, Edwards and Kerry Voted Nay, Breaux and Landrieu Voted Yea)


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Breaux And Landrieu On ANWR Drilling: Edwards And Kerry Voted Against, Breaux And Landrieu Voted For. (S. Con. Res. 23, CQ Vote #59: Adopted 52-48: R 8-43; D 43-5, I 1-0, 3/19/03, Edwards and Kerry Voted Yea, Breaux and Landrieu Voted Nay)


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Sens. Breaux And Landrieu On 2001 Tax Cuts: Edwards And Kerry Voted Against, Breaux And Landrieu Voted For. (H.R. 1836, CQ Vote #165: Passed 62-38: R 50-0; D 12-38, 5/23/01, Edwards and Kerry Voted Nay, Breaux and Landrieu Voted Yea)


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Sens. Breaux And Landrieu On $792 Billion Tax Cut: Edwards And Kerry Voted Against, Breaux And Landrieu Voted For. (S. 1429, CQ Vote #247: Passed 57-43: R 52-2; D 4-41; I 1-0, 7/30/99, Edwards and Kerry Voted Nay, Breaux and Landrieu Voted Yea)


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Sens. Breaux And Landrieu On Banning Partial-Birth Abortion: Edwards And Kerry Voted Against, Breaux And Landrieu Voted For. (S. 1692, CQ Vote #340: Passed 63-34: R 48-3; D 14-31, 10/21/99, Edwards and Kerry Voted Nay, Breaux and Landrieu Voted Yea)


* Sens. Edwards And Kerry Disagreed With Breaux On Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA): Edwards Voiced Opposition, Kerry Voted Against, Breaux Voted For. (“Kerry And Edwards Focus On Marriage,” The Austin American-Statesman, 2/27/04; H.R. 3396, CQ Vote #280: Passed 85-14: R 53-0; D 32-14, 9/10/96, Kerry Voted Nay, Breaux Voted Yea)


By the way, despite these differences, both senators, as well as all three of Louisiana's Democratic senate hopefuls, are firmly in the Kerry-Edwards camp. I suppose they can't all be Zell Millers, can they?

Full story here.

Louisiana Republican Party Chairman comments on choice of Senator Edwards to be Kerry's running mate.

Here's what the leader of the Louisiana Republican party had to say, courtesy of politicsla.com.

“The only thing separating John Edwards from John Kerry is their accents,” said Roger Villere, Chairman of the Republican Party of Louisiana. “John Edwards delivers his pessimism with a southern drawl and a smile.”

“When it comes to their voting records, both Kerry and Edwards out of touch with Louisiana voters on important issues like taxes, partial birth abortion, Medicare Reform, and national security. In fact, they are so out of the mainstream that they are even at odds with members of their own party,” Villere added. “Kerry’s selection of Edwards is great news for the Bush campaign in Louisiana.”

-- PoliticsLA.com - Tuesday, July 06, 2004


Could the selection of Edwards have an effect on Louisiana's senate race? Senator Breaux said not too long ago he believed Edwards would be a better choice to help Louisiana Democrats on the ballot. However, Edwards is almost as liberal as Kerry, and being a liberal southerner doesn't get you far in Louisiana. Just ask former Vice President Gore.

Vitter takes his message to Shreveport

The headline says it all. Read for yourself:

Shaded from searing sunlight by a 20-foot-tall bronze bald eagle, U.S. Rep. David Vitter, candidate for U.S. Senate, laid out his war plan Monday to defend the nation and protect its veterans.

That plan, in so many words, is that the best defense is a good offense.

"To win the war on terror we can't just play defense," Vitter said. "We need to both defend the homeland and go on the offense -- hunting terrorists down abroad before they come to our own shores. This is a very big issue and a clear choice in this election between those like President George Bush and myself who feel we must go on offense, that this is a military challenge, versus John Kerry and my opponents in the Senate race who have a different view, which is that the war on terror is primarily a law enforcement defensive operation. I completely disagree with that premise."
(snip)

Vitter outlined his campaign plan, dubbed "Fighting for Our Future," to about 40 supporters Monday at the Veterans Memorial on Shreveport's Clyde Fant Parkway.

"This is about winning the war on terror and properly honoring our veterans. This is the heart and soul of our campaign," Vitter said. "Today is a perfectly appropriate day -- the day after the Fourth of July, after we focused on our freedom and what it takes to preserve that freedom."

Vitter said he supports the Bush doctrine "which says we are at war ... which clearly says to other countries that you must help root our terrorism or be considered part of the problem.

"This has already begun to force those who air or harbor terrorists in any way to change their behavior or face the consequences," Vitter said.

Elements of his Fighting For Our Future plan include:

Working to ease the burden of Louisiana's deployed service members and their families back home.

Authoring legislation to give tax relief to businesses who keep employees on the payroll when they're activated.

Developing the military with joint training so that it's swifter, more mobile.

"That's going on the offense. As I said the other side of the coin is playing smart defense, carefully securing the homeland," he said.

His strategy:

Providing support to the Eighth District Coast Guard based in Louisiana.

Working with ports to ensure the safety of Louisiana's waterways.

Working closely with state and local first responders to ensure they have the resources they need.

Fighting to bring a regional headquarters of the Department of Homeland security to Louisiana.

"When you look at our part of the world, the greatest collection of threats and targets are in Louisiana between our waterways, our port infrastructure and energy infrastructure," Vitter said.

Among those on hand for Vitter's campaign pitch Monday was Robert Stewart, chairman of the Greater Shreveport Veterans Memorial Steering Committee. Stewart said he supports Vitter's Fighting for Our Future plan. It reflects he "shares the concerns and interests" of not only Shreveport and the state but the nation as well, Stewart said.


Full story here.

Monday, July 05, 2004

Vitter Reports $3.4 million on hand

Congressman Vitter's campaign put out a press release showing $3.4 million on hand, putting him head and shoulders over his Democratic rivals.

“I am extremely pleased with our fundraising to date. It shows that the people of Louisiana are excited about my campaign. Louisianans are looking for a U.S. Senator to put their issues and concerns ahead of Washington special interest groups,” Vitter stated. “The vast majority of the money raised for my campaign has come from individuals here in Louisiana. This shows that my message of putting Louisiana first is resonating across the state. I am proud so many Louisianans are investing in their future through my campaign,” added Vitter.

Keep a look out for Vitter in your area! This week he'll be on a bus tour throughout Louisiana touting his plan, entitled "Fighting For Our Future." Read about it, plus the full press release here.

Sunday, July 04, 2004

Rep. Chris John touts "fiscal conservatism," but fails to act!

One of Rep. Chris John's major campaign planks is his commitment to being a "fiscal conservative," and cutting the deficit. However, his approach is primarily centered on tax increases to balance the budget. But as Ronald Reagan proved, cutting income taxes across the board led to a decades long economic boost that eventually wiped out the deficit in the nineties. But what about government spending? Would the "fiscally conservative" John vote to cut federal spending? Apparently not, when given the chance recently! Here's the proof:

H R 4663: Spending Control Act, voted on June 25, 2004. This bill would have imposed tight budgetary controls, eliminated "baseline budgeting" so programs do not grow automatically each fiscal year, and created enforcable spending limits on government entitlements. So who voted which way?

While the bill was in debate, several amendments were brought up and voted on. Here's the breakdown:

On the amendment proposed by Rep. Chris Chocola, which would have replaced the current 20 budget functions with a one-page budget that divides spending into five categories: mandatory spending, defense discretionary spending, non-defense descretionary spending, emergency spending, and interest on the debt.

Yes: Vitter
No: John

On the amendment proposed by Rep. Mike Castle, which would eliminate the requirement to provide budget authority and outlays for the 20 separate functions in the budget resolution. Under the amendment, the required contents of the budget resolution would include: total of new budget authority and outlays; revenues; surplus or deficit; and public debt.

Yes: Vitter
No: John

On the two amendments proposed by Rep. Jeb Hensarling, one to provide a spending cap on entitlement spending, the other to provide for an automatic continuing resolution in the event that an agreement is not reached on spending levels by the legal deadline.

Yes: Vitter
No: John

On the three amendments proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan, numbered 7, 8 and 9 respectfully.

7.) convert the current non-binding budget resolution into a joint budget resolution that if signed by the President would have the force of law. In addition, if the President vetoes the budget resolution, Congress is allowed to proceed on its own under a concurrent budget resolution.

8.) establish Budget Protection Accounts which would allow Congress to target spending during the appropriation and direct spending processes and redirect that spending for deficit reduction at the end of the fiscal year.

9.) initiate enhanced rescission for the President to propose the elimination of wasteful spending identified in appropriation bills. The proposal must be transmitted to Congress accompanied by legislative language for the rescissions and any necessary reduction in the spending limits.

Yes: Vitter (7,8,9)
Yes: John (8,9)
No: John (7)

On the amendment proposed by Rep. Mark Kirk which set in place a number of budgetary controls and spending reductions. Deviating from the norm, this time John sided with Vitter.

Yes: Vitter, John

On the amendment proposed by Rep. Mark Brady, to establish establish a 12 member Federal Sunset Commission to review all federal agencies for their efficiency, effectiveness, redundancy and need. Again John jumps on board, as well as all but the most liberal members of Congress.

Yes: Vitter, John

On the Hensarling Subsititute Amendment, which among other things, Requires two-thirds supermajority vote in both houses for over-budget spending. Establishes "Family Budget Protection Accounts" to allow Congress to redirect savings found during appropriations process to tax relief or deficit reduction at the end of fiscal year. Limits growth in entitlement spending to inflation adjustment for each program and population growth; discretionary caps allow growth for inflation, with firewall separating defense, non-defense, and emergency spending.

Yes: Vitter
No: John

On the amendment proposed by Rep. John Spratt, to reinstate the Pay-As-You-Go budget rules for the Congress. However, this bill would have required tax cuts to be rescinded to offset government costs. Guess how this turned out.

Yes: John
No: Vitter

On Final Passage of the bill, after all amendments have been offered up.

Yes: Vitter
No: John

There you have it. The Spending Control Act ultimately failed to pass. Rep. John's vote would not have made the difference, but it would have said a lot about where he stands on government spending. He voted against the majority of amendments, many of which gave the act real teeth in trimming government spending and imposing responsible budgetary rules. Vitter supported them, John did not. On the other hand, when the possiblity of a tax increase came up, John voted yes, while Vitter voted no. And when the final bill came for passage, Vitter said yes, John said no.

This vote illustrates the dichotomy between the two men who would be Louisiana's next senator. If government is incapable of reducing spending to balance its books, it's not the taxpayer's fault. Unfortunately, Chris John seems to think it is.

The full record can be found here.

Saturday, July 03, 2004

Presenting "The Hillary Doctrine"

Hillary Clinton did the world a favor last week by telling a group of Democratic fundraisers that should the Democrats regain the presidency and Congress, they should be prepared to pony up in higher taxes. To that end, I have introduced the senator's quote, alongside some info pertaining to our own Democratic candidates for Senate. You'll see that our own "centrist" Democrats may be looking more left than some might think...

Also, I've added a counter and a new tagboard.

Rep. John tries to increase taxes again

Rep. Chris John recently touted his support for increased funding for homeland security, however, it does come with a price. Read below.

Congressman Chris John today voted for a bill that would, in next year’s budget, invest $4.7 billion in reducing the deficit and $14.2 billion in critical priorities – including homeland security, education, and veterans and military families. To offset the cost, the bill would reduce a portion of the tax cuts for one year only for person’s with adjusted gross incomes of a million dollars or more.

Given the rumblings on Capitol Hill among Democrats and moderate Republicans to scale back President Bush's tax cuts, I have sincere doubts that this would only last a year. The GOP and conservatives must not give an inch, or our politicians will likely delay reinstating the tax cuts a year, than another, than another, and well, can you say "slippery slope?"

Full Story Here.