Flashback: April Debate Between All Four Candidates
This debate is about two months old, but it is valuable in laying out where the Senate candidates stand, and given Congressman John's recent effort to challenge Vitter on tax breaks, it is very informative on where he stands. Here is the bulk of the article.
While [Congressman Chris] John stressed his willingness to challenge leaders of both parties, the other three candidates reflected the partisan fissures that have left the American electorate deeply divided heading into the Nov. 2 election.
Kennedy took the most populist approach by sharply criticizing the Bush administration's record on job creation and challenged Vitter's support of the president's tax cuts.
"I don't think millionaires are the backbone of the American economy," Kennedy said. "I think the backbone of the American economy are middle-class people."
Asked how he would craft a national energy bill, Kennedy emphasized the development of alternative energy sources and conservation while blasting the administration for not paying enough attention to Louisiana's coastal erosion.
"If California or Florida were being taken advantage of this way, they wouldn't put up with it," Kennedy said.
Vitter cited recent reports on economic growth and job creation as proof that the administration's tax cuts are working as intended. "Because of the great proposals that President Bush put into law . . . we have come out of the last recession," Vitter said.
But the economic turnaround will stall unless Congress votes to make the tax cuts permanent instead of allowing them to expire in the coming years, Vitter said. "Unless we take further action to extend them or make them permanent, the result will be a tax increase right when we're coming out of a recession."
Vitter's remark drew criticism from John, who said Congress should be required to pay for any tax-cut proposals by trimming an equal amount of spending from the budget.
John, who supported the president's 10-year, $1.35 trillion tax cut in 2001, said the federal budget deficit has since become too large to justify the tax cuts. He said he would allow them to expire.
"The way you stop a hole from getting bigger is to stop digging," John said.
But John said he could support certain targeted tax cuts and described himself as the candidate who can bridge partisan divides in Washington.
"The people of Louisiana do not want to wage political warfare, partisan battles," John said.
Vitter criticized Senate Democrats for blocking an energy bill crafted by Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-Chackbay, that would have given Louisiana $1.1 billion over 10 years to fight coastal erosion. The bill, which would have cost $31 billion overall, drew fire from conservatives and liberals on Capitol Hill as being too expensive and loaded with giveaways to special interests.
"Quite frankly, there's some pork in that bill," Vitter said. Still, he said, its benefit to Louisiana would have outweighed its cost.
Morrell, considered by many to be a long shot because he got a late start and has raised little money so far, said he's running in large part because open Senate seats are rare in Louisiana.
"It's really quite simple: It's an opportunity. This doesn't come often in this state," Morrell said.
Morrell said Congress should never have authorized the invasion of Iraq, and he questioned the administration's original justification for going to war to remove weapons of mass destruction that have yet to be found.
"A little over 600 Americans have died -- for what? A bunch of lies," Morrell said. "In the beginning I had respect for this president, but after finding out what he really stands for, I am ashamed."
Morrell's statement is what is expected from the more liberal members of the Democratic Party. John's comments about ending partisan rancor are all well and good, but he fails to mention that it is the Democratic leadership that is blocking President Bush's judicial nominees and will do anything to defeat making the President's tax relief permament. Speaking of which, John has said he would allow the tax cuts to expire, bringing him more in line with Senator Kerry's tax increasing policies.
Louisianans have been fooled by this "talk moderate at home and vote liberal in D.C." act before. Will it happen again? Not if this blog has anything to say about it.
The full story can be found here.



